Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7265
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAboalshamat, Khalid T.-
dc.contributor.authorAlthagafi, Tariq K.-
dc.contributor.authorAlsaeedi, Saad A.-
dc.contributor.authorAlhumaidi, Saif N.-
dc.contributor.authorAlemam, Amjad A.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-05T04:00:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-05T04:00:09Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn1658-3612-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7265-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Teledentistry conveniently delivers dental care when in-person visits are restricted, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to assess Saudi Arabian patients’ accuracy, perceptions, knowledge, attitudes, and challenges regarding teledentistry used for diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as its accuracy, versus traditional dental visits. Methods: A single-blind, parallel-group randomised controlled trial design was used. The 70 participants were randomised equally into study and control groups. While the control group waited, the study group received teledentistry diagnoses which were compared with baseline clinical examinations retrieved from the UQU dental hospital, Makkah, KSA. After the intervention was completed, all participants answered a questionnaire. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in knowledge or attitudes regarding teledentistry. However, study group participants had more favourable experiences with teledentistry. They reported good accuracy with diagnosis and recording of their chief complaints (74.3%), number of missing teeth (74.3%), number of filled teeth (71.4%), and oral hygiene status (65.7%). Additionally, moderate accuracy was reported on recording of health complaints (51.4%) and number of decayed teeth (40.?%). The number of decayed teeth and the decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMF) index scores reported using teledentistry were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than reported in the baseline examinations. Conclusion: Teledentistry is widely accepted by patients and can be efficient for preliminary examinations, particularly during pandemic lockdowns or in more frequently occurring situations such as severe weather conditions, but subsequent clinical examination is necessary for maximally accurate diagnoses.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOriginal Article;506-515-
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectRandomised clinical trialen_US
dc.subjectTeledentistryen_US
dc.subjectTelehealthen_US
dc.titleAccuracy and perceptions of teledentistry in KSA during the COVID-19 pandemic: A single-centre randomised controlled trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Vol 17 No 3 (2022)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
506-515.pdf506-5151.72 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.