Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5716
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Bethany-
dc.contributor.authorE. Davidson, Zoe-
dc.contributor.authorO’Brien, Katie-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-09T03:33:08Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-09T03:33:08Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5716-
dc.description.abstractDescribing Energy Expenditure in Children with a Chronic Disease: A Systematic Review Bethany Luo 1,y , Zoe E. Davidson 1,2,y,* , Katie O’Brien 1 , Evelyn Volders 1 , Jeffrey Lu 1 , Kali Dunlea 1 , Matisse Lazzari 1 , Natassja Billich 1 , Kay Nguo 1 1 Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Foods, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 2 Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia ABSTRACT Understanding energy expenditure in children with chronic disease is critical due to the impact on energy homeostasis and growth. This systematic review aimed to describe available literature of resting (REE) and total energy expenditure (TEE) in children with chronic disease measured by gold-standard methods of indirect calorimetry (IC) and doubly labeled water (DLW), respectively. A literature search was conducted using OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane, and Scopus until July 2023. Studies were included if the mean age of the participants was 18 y, participants had a chronic disease, and measurement of REE or TEE was conducted using IC or DLW, respectively. Studies investigating energy expenditure in premature infants, patients with acute illness, and intensive care patients were excluded. The primary outcomes were the type of data (REE, TEE) obtained and REE/TEE stratified by disease group. In total, 271 studies across 24 chronic conditions were identified. Over 60% of retrieved studies were published >10 y ago and conducted on relatively small population sizes (n range ¼ 1–398). Most studies obtained REE samples (82%) rather than that of TEE (8%), with very few exploring both samples (10%). There was variability in the difference in energy expenditure in children with chronic disease compared with that of healthy control group across and within disease groups. Eighteen predictive energy equations were generated across the included studies. Quality assessment of the studies identified poor reporting of energy expenditure protocols, which may limit the validity of results. Current literature on energy expenditure in children with chronic disease, although extensive, reveals key future research opportunities. International collaboration and robust measurement of energy expenditure should be conducted to generate meaningful predictive energy equations to provide updated evidence that is reflective of emerging disease-modifying therapies. This study was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42020204690. Keywords: systematic review, energy expenditure, children, indirect calorimetry, doubly labeled wateren_US
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectenergy expenditureen_US
dc.subjectchildrenen_US
dc.subjectindirect calorimetryen_US
dc.subjectdoubly labeled wateren_US
dc.titleDescribing Energy Expenditure in Children with a Chronic Disease: A Systematic Reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 15 NO 4 (2024)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
8. Describing-Energy-Expenditure-in-Children-with-a-C.pdf691.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.