Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4950
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSparling, Thalia M-
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Howard-
dc.contributor.authorBoakye, Samuel-
dc.contributor.authorJohn, Denny-
dc.contributor.authorKadiyala, Suneetha-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-14T07:29:29Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-14T07:29:29Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4950-
dc.description.abstractNew tools, metrics, and methods in agriculture, food systems, and nutrition (A&N) research proliferated in the decade following the 2007–2008 food price crisis.We map these developments across themes derived fromconceptual A&N pathways and expert consultations.We created an interactive Evidence and Gap Map (EGM) from a systematic search of published and gray literature since 2008, following Campbell Collaboration guidelines. We retrieved over 30,000 reports from published literature databases, and individually searched 20 online repositories. We systematically screened 24,359 reports by title and/or abstract, 1577 by full report, and included 904 eligible reports. The EGM consists of rows of thematic domains and columns of types of tools, metrics, and methods, aswell as extensive coding applied as filters. Each cell of the map represents research surrounding a type of tool, metric, or method within a given theme. Reports in each cell are grouped by stage of development, which expand to a corresponding bibliography. Users can filter EGM reports by various characteristics. The 4 most populated domains were: diets, nutrition, and health; primary food production; water, sanitation, and hygiene; and environment and sustainability. The 4 most common types of metrics, methods, and tools were: diet metrics; footprint analysis (especially water); technology applications; and network or Bayesian analysis. Gaps represent areas of few or no reports of innovation between 2008 and 2018. There were gaps in reports and innovations related to: power or conflicts of interest; food environments; markets; private sector engagement; food loss and waste; conflict; study design and system-level tools, metrics, and methods. The EGM is a comprehensive tool to navigate advances in measurement in A&N research: to highlight trends and gaps, conduct further synthesis and development, and prioritize the agenda for future work. This narrative synthesis accompanies the EGM, which can be found at https://www.anhacademy.org/evidence-and-gap-mapen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAdvances in Nutritionen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReview;1122-1136-
dc.subjectfood systemsen_US
dc.subjectnutritionen_US
dc.subjectagricultureen_US
dc.subjectmetricsen_US
dc.subjectmethodsen_US
dc.subjectevidence synthesisen_US
dc.subjectinnovationen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding Pathways Between Agriculture, Food Systems, and Nutrition: An Evidence and Gap Map of Research Tools, Metrics, and Methods in the Last 10 Yearsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 12 NO 4 (2021)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1122-1136.pdf1.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.