Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10783
Title: | Dietary Sugar Intake and Incident Type 2 Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies |
Authors: | Della Corte, Karen A Bosler 1, Tyler McClure, Cole E Buyken, Anette D LeCheminant, James Schwingshackl, Lukas Della Corte, Dennis |
Keywords: | dietary sugar, sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit juice, type 2 diabetes, dose-response meta-analysis |
Issue Date: | 21-Mar-2025 |
Publisher: | Elsevier Inc. |
Abstract: | ABSTRACT The dose-response relationship between dietary sugar and type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk is uncertain. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched through July 9, 2024 for prospective cohort studies reporting relative measures of incident T2D risk by categories of dietary sugar (total, free, added, fructose, sucrose) or 2 beverage sources (non-diet sugar-sweetened beverages [SSBs], fruit juice) in healthy adults. Linear and restricted cubic spline dose-response models were fitted for each exposure, and studyspecific slopes and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Q-statistics. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) tool. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was applied to assess the certainty of evidence. Of 10,384 studies, 29 cohorts were included: SSB: 18 (n ¼ 541,288); fruit juice: 14 (n ¼ 490,413); sucrose: 7 (n ¼ 223,238); total sugar: 4 (n ¼ 109,858); fructose: 5 (n ¼ 158,136); and added sugar: 2 (n ¼ 31,004). Studies were conducted in Europe (13), United States (11), Asia (6), Australia (4), and Latin America (3). Each additional serving of SSB and fruit juice was associated with a higher risk of T2D (risk ratio [RR]: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.17, 1.35 and RR: 1.05; 95% CI: >1.00, 1.11, respectively; moderate certainty). In contrast, 20 g/d intakes of total sugar and sucrose were inversely associated with T2D (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94, 0.98; low certainty; and RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.91, <1.00; moderate certainty, respectively). No associations were found for added sugar (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.01; low certainty) or fructose (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.83, 1.15; very low certainty). These findings suggest that dietary sugar consumed as a beverage (SSB and fruit juice) is associated with incident T2D risk. The results do not support the common assumption that dietary sugar (i.e., total sugar and sucrose), irrespective of type and amount, is consistently associated with increased T2D risk. This study was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42023401800. Keywords: dietary sugar, sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit juice, type 2 diabetes, dose-response meta-analysis |
URI: | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10783 |
ISSN: | 21618313 |
Appears in Collections: | VOL 16 NO 5 (2025) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
11. Dietary-Sugar-Intake-and-Incident-Type-2-Diabetes-.pdf | 1.09 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.