Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9524
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tai, Wei-Chen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, I-Ting | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Hsin-Ming | - |
dc.contributor.author | dkk. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-06T03:23:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-06T03:23:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1684-1182 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9524 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: High-dose dual therapy (HDDT) using proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) and amoxicillin attracted attention for its simplicity and lower adverse event profile. Besides, vonoprazan is not available worldwide. This real-world study aims to compare the efficacy of esomeprazole-based and rabeprazole-based HDDT regimens and to identify clinical factors influencing outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study enrolled 346 Helicobacter pylori-infected naı¨ve patients from January 2016 to August 2023. Patients were assigned to either a 14-day esomeprazole-based HDDT (EA-14; esomeprazole 40 mg t.i.d. and amoxicillin 750 mg q.i.d. for 14 days, n Z 173) or a 14-day rabeprazole-based HDDT (RA-14; rabeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg q.i.d. for 14 days, n Z 173). Results: Five patients from the EA-14 group and 10 from the RA-14 group were lost to followup, resulting in 168 and 163 patients for the per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. Eradication rates for the EA-14 and RA-14 groups were 90.2% and 80.9% (P Z 0.014) in intention-totreat (ITT) analysis; and 92.9% and 85.9% (P Z 0.039) in PP analysis. Adverse event rates were similar between the two groups (11.9% vs 11.7%, P Z 0.944). In multiple logistic regression analysis, ageS60 was associated with eradication failure (P Z 0.046) and a trend of significance for smoking (P Z 0.060) in the EA-14 group but not in the RA-14 group. A trend of significance was also observed for eradication regimens (EA-14 vs RA-14) (P Z 0.071). The antibiotic resistance rates were amoxicillin (2.3%), clarithromycin (14.7%), metronidazole (40.3%), and dual resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole (7.0%). Conclusions: Esomeprazole-based HDDT achieved over 90% eradication rates but rabeprazolebased HDDT, which failed. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Original Article;601-608 | - |
dc.subject | Helicobacter pylori infection | en_US |
dc.subject | Esomeprazole | en_US |
dc.subject | Rabeprazole | en_US |
dc.subject | High dose dual therapy | en_US |
dc.subject | Antibiotic susceptibility | en_US |
dc.title | The multicenter real-world report of the efficacies of 14-day esomeprazole-based and rabeprazole-based high-dose dual therapy in first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication in Taiwan | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Vol. 57 No. 4 (2024) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
601-608.pdf | 371.73 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.