Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9522
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Hsu-Yuan-
dc.contributor.authorTseng, How-Yang-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chieh-Lung-
dc.contributor.authordkk.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-06T03:17:22Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-06T03:17:22Z-
dc.date.issued2024-08-
dc.identifier.issn1684-1182-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9522-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The increasing prevalence of drug-resistant pathogens leads to delays in adequate antimicrobial treatment in intensive care units (ICU). The real-world influence of the BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel on pathogen identification, diagnostic concordance with conventional culture methods, and antimicrobial stewardship in the ICU remains unexplored. Methods: This retrospective observational study, conducted from July 2021 to August 2023, involved adult ICU patients with positive blood cultures who underwent BCID2 testing. The concordance between BCID2 and conventional culture results was examined, and its impact on antimicrobial stewardship was assessed through a comprehensive retrospective review of patient records by intensivists. Results: A total of 129 blood specimens from 113 patients were analysed. Among these patients, a high proportion of drug-resistant strains were noted, including carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) (57.1%), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (100%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (70%), and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) (100%). The time from blood culture collection to obtaining BCID2 results was significantly shorter than conventional culture (46.2 h vs. 86.9 h, p < 0.001). BCID2 demonstrated 100% concordance in genotypeephenotype correlation in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) for CRKP, carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli, MRSA, and VRE. A total of 40.5% of patients received inadequate empirical antimicrobial treatment. The antimicrobial regimen was adjusted or confirmed in 55.4% of patients following the BCID2 results. Conclusions: In the context of a high burden of drug-resistant pathogens, BCID2 demonstrated rapid pathogen and AMR detection, with a noticeable impact on antimicrobial stewardship in BSI in the ICU.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectionen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOriginal Article;580-593-
dc.subjectAntimicrobial stewardshipen_US
dc.subjectBloodstream infectionen_US
dc.subjectCritically illen_US
dc.subjectDrug-resistant pathogenen_US
dc.subjectIntensive care unitsen_US
dc.subjectMultiplex polymerase chain reactioen_US
dc.titleThe real-world impact of the BioFire FilmArray blood culture identification 2 panel on antimicrobial stewardship among patients with bloodstream infections in intensive care units with a high burden of drug-resistant pathogensen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Vol. 57 No. 4 (2024)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
580-593.pdf1.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.