Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9110
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Yu-Lin-
dc.contributor.authorKo, Wen-Chien-
dc.contributor.authorHsueh, Po-Ren-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-16T07:42:08Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-16T07:42:08Z-
dc.date.issued2023-02-
dc.identifier.citationOriginal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9110-
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background: Multi-drug resistant Enterobacterales is a growing health threat. Imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, are not clinically used in Taiwan and the susceptibility is lack from routine laboratory tests. Methods: Broth microdilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints criteria. Isolates that were not susceptible to imipenem (MIC 2 mg/L), imipenem/relebactam (MIC 2 mg/L), or ceftolozane-tazobactam (MIC 4 mg/L) were selected for further molecular testing for genes encoding extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC b-lactamases, and carbapenemases by multiplex PCR assays. Results: A total of 290 Enterobacterales isolates from 9 participating hospitals were collected in 2020. Escherichia coli (n Z 135, 46.6%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n Z 88, 30.3%) were two leading pathogens of all Enterobacterales isolates. The antimicrobial agents with susceptibility rates more than 90% included amikacin (99.3%, 288/290), ertapenem (90.0%, 261/290), meropenem (97.2%, 282/290), imipenem/relebactam (94.8%, 275/290) and meropenem/vaborbactam (99.3%, 288/290). K. pneumoniae isolates were less susceptible to ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam and ceftozolane/tazobactam than E. coli (all p < 0.05). ESBL, AmpC, and carbapenemase were detected in 40.5% (17/42), 45.2% (19/42) and 11.9% (5/ 42) among tested isolates, respectively. The 5 carbapenemase genes included 4 blaKPC and 1 blaIMP. The imipenem-non-susceptible isolates (n Z 30) had higher susceptibility rates to meropenem/vaborbactam (93.3%, 28/30) than imipenem/relebactam (50%, 12/30) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam had excellent efficacy against Enterobacterales isolates. Meropenem/vaborbactam allowed better salvage therapy for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectionen_US
dc.subjectNovel b-lactam combination agentsen_US
dc.subjectEnterobacteralesen_US
dc.subjectMultidrug resistance (MDR)en_US
dc.subjectCarbapenem resistanceen_US
dc.subjectCross resistanceen_US
dc.titleIn vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and comparators against Enterobacterales from patients with intra-abdominal infections: Results of the study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) in Taiwan, 2020en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 56 NO 1 2023

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
75-83.pdf711.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.