Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8815
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIrfani, Irawati-
dc.contributor.authorGunawan, Fany-
dc.contributor.authorSatari, Karmelita-
dc.contributor.authorSari, Maya-
dc.contributor.authorOktarima, Primawita-
dc.contributor.authorCaesarya, Sesy-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-09T07:12:57Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-09T07:12:57Z-
dc.date.issued2024-09-
dc.identifier.citationResearch Articleen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8815-
dc.description.abstractIn the process of a pediatric eye exam, cycloplegic refraction is a crucial step. Since no single cycloplegic drug is ideal, a combination regimen is employed. This study compares the ocular (refractive power and pupil diameter) and systemic (blood pressure and heart rate) effects of administering a combination of 1% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine, with or without 1% tropicamide, to children with refractive errors. This study aimed to discover a more feasible regimen for children. This was a single-blind study, a randomized clinical trial conducted from November–December 2020 in children with mild to moderate refractive errors. Group A received 1% cyclopentolate, 2.5% phenylephrine, and 1% tropicamide (SFT), whereas group B received 1% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine (SF). The outcomes were measured using an auto refractometer and IOL Master® 700. Before and 60 minutes after medication was administered, blood pressure and heart rate were measured. There were 54 participants (108 eyes) with an average age of 12.85±2.84 years. Although the SFT group's refractive power and pupil width were greater than those of the SF group, the differences were not statistically significant (p=0.271 and p=0.088). Heart rate (p=0.521) and blood pressure (systolic p=0.201; diastolic p=0.950) did not significantly differ between the two groups. Despite mydriasis manifested more rapidly in the SFT group, there was no discernible difference in the cycloplegic effects between those groups. SF might be a more feasible regimen for cycloplegic refraction in children with refractive errors.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMajalah Kedokteran Bandungen_US
dc.subjectCyclopentolateen_US
dc.subjectcycloplegicen_US
dc.subjectmydriasisen_US
dc.subjectphenylephrineen_US
dc.subjecttropicamideen_US
dc.titleComparison of Different Cycloplegic Refraction Regimens for Childrenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 56 NO 3 2024

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
214-220.pdf968.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.