Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7621
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlotaibi, Shaymaa Y.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T03:11:35Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-09T03:11:35Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn1658-3612-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7621-
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: In 2013, the KSA made Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) accreditation mandatory for all healthcare facilities, including primary health care centres (PHCs) and set a target to have 502 PHCs accredited by 2020. However, there is a real gap in knowledge and research on the impact of CBAHI accreditation on PHCs. This absence of research has been linked to the lack of understanding of the accreditation programme. Therefore, it was recommended by scholars that the KSA could learn from the experience of other countries to improve policy implementation and avoid future complications. Methods: This study aimed to explore lessons that KSA can draw from developed and developing countries that have implemented accreditation programmes for PHCs. We performed a literature review using a systematic approach to identify articles related to the accreditation of PHCs. The identified articles were examined by applying evaluation criteria in respect of prospective policy transfer. Results: The research results yielded 22 publications from different countries. There were variations among the countries in the specific information acquired. However, Denmark had the highest number of articles providing detailed information. Regarding their aims, most studies shared the same goal of improving quality and patient safety. Generally, there was limited discussion of policy failure compared with policy success. In addition, most of the countries were in the process of implementing local accreditation. Almost all of the countries that had implemented external programmes were developing countries. In terms of application criteria, most cases made recommendations for the programme or for PHCs. Conclusion: Analysis indicated that because of the differences in information between countries and settings, there is no ideal country-based experience from which the KSA can transfer lessons. Lessons from outside the KSA would need careful consideration when adopting them in the local context of the Kingdom.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOriginal Article;711-725-
dc.subjectAccreditationen_US
dc.subjectDeveloped and developing countriesen_US
dc.subjectPolicy transferen_US
dc.subjectPrimary health centresen_US
dc.subjectKSAen_US
dc.titleAccreditation of primary health care centres in the KSA: Lessons from developed and developing countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Vol 18 No 4 (2023)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
711-725.pdf711-7251.77 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.