Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7488
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTan, Yongming-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Meng-
dc.contributor.authorHe, Laichang-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T04:42:53Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-07T04:42:53Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn1658-3612-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7488-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The goal of this study was to analyze the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and viral encephalitis (VE) at the initial stage of onset. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of the clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, electroencephalogram examination, imaging examinations, and treatment outcomes of 24 VE patients and 20 AE patients. Results: The onset age was significantly younger in the VE group than in the AE group, mainly occurring in adolescents (P < 0.05). The proportions of fever, headache, and vomiting were higher in the VE group than in the AE group (P < 0.05), and there were few manifestations of central hypoventilation. The incidence of abnormal myocardial enzymes was significantly higher in the VE group than in the AE group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in electroencephalogram test results between the VE and AE groups. Regarding magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the proportion of single lesion involving a single lobe or multiple asymmetries involving the limbic system in the VE group was higher than that in the AE group (P < 0.05). The incidence of lesion enhancement in the VE group was higher than that in the AE group. Meanwhile, diffusionweighted imaging sequence was more sensitive than T2 liquid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence in the detection, efficacy evaluation, and follow-up review of the AE and VE groups. Conclusion: The onset age of VE is younger, and the clinical symptoms of AE and VE differ with statistical significance. MRI can objectively reflect the imaging characteristics of both groups. Combining early clinical manifestations with imaging manifestations can facilitate early diagnosis and treatment, and improve the prognosis.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOriginal Article;271-278-
dc.subjectAutoimmune encephalitisen_US
dc.subjectClinical and imagingen_US
dc.subjectDifferential diagnosisen_US
dc.subjectViral encephalitisen_US
dc.titleClinical and MRI differential analysis of autoimmune encephalitis and viral encephalitisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Vol 18 No 2 (2023)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
271-278.pdf271-2781.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.