Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7331
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHussein, Ayat M.-
dc.contributor.authorMohammed-Salih, Harraa S.-
dc.contributor.authorAl-Sheakli, Iman I.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-06T04:16:11Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-06T04:16:11Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn1658-3612-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7331-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of four cleaning agents on the flexural modulus and light transmittance properties of polypropylene and copolyester thermoplastic retainer materials after longterm exposure. Methods: A total of 120 pieces of standardized copolyester and polypropylene retainer materials were tested after being thermoformed. They were divided equally into six subgroups: as-received, artificial saliva, chlorhexidine, alcohol-based and alcohol-free mouthwashes, and Retainer Brite . The pieces were subjected to a cleaning process involving 15 minute immersion three times weekly for 3 months. The flexural modulus and light transmittance were then measured for all specimens with three point bending tests and spectrophotometry, respectively. One-way ANOVA and independent samples t-test were applied to compare the means, and Tukey’s post hoc test was used in cases of significant differences. The threshold for significance was 0.05. Results: For each retainer type, the statistical results revealed that the flexural modulus values of the copolyester retainer material significantly differed from those of polypropylene material under chlorhexidine mouthwash, alcohol-based mouthwash, and Retainer Brite conditions. Copolyester and polypropylene showed significant differences in light transmittance under all conditions. No significant difference in flexural modulus values was observed among conditions, whereas significant differences in light transmittance were observed between alcohol-based mouthwash and the other conditions for copolyester material. Conclusions: According to our results, any cleaning agent can be safely used for both materials without affecting the elastic modulus. However, alcohol-based mouthwash decreases the light transmittance of copolyester retainer material.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOriginal Article;861-868-
dc.subjectPhysical propertyen_US
dc.subjectPolypropylene materialen_US
dc.subjectRetainer cleaningen_US
dc.subjectThermoplastic retaineren_US
dc.subjectTranslucencyen_US
dc.titleEffects of various cleaning agents on polypropylene and copolyester thermoplastic orthodontic retainer materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Vol 17 No 5 (2022)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
861-868.pdf861-8682.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.