Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7298
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGari, Abdulrahim-
dc.contributor.authorHussein, Khulood-
dc.contributor.authorDaghestani, Mazin-
dc.contributor.authorAljuhani, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorBukhari, Mahdya-
dc.contributor.authorAlqahtani, Abrar-
dc.contributor.authorAlmarwani, Miznah-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-06T02:14:02Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-06T02:14:02Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn1658-3612-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7298-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Obstetrical hemorrhage contributes significantly to maternal morbidity and mortality. Assessment of blood loss while undergoing cesarean sections (CS) is essential in lowering the morbidity and mortality, however this amount is commonly underestimated by the surgeon and probably the anesthetist too. Methods: This study addresses this issue by comparing three separate ways of assessing blood loss during cesarean sections. For each of 97 full-term pregnant women undergoing elective CS, blood loss was measured by the following: visual estimation by both the obstetrician and the anesthetist, weighing surgical pads pre operatively and post operatively and by calculations (multiplying the difference of pre-operative and postoperative hemoglobin values by the patient’s estimated blood volume). Results: The results of this study indicated that the lowest estimated value for blood loss came from visual estimation, while the highest value came from the mathematical formula. Anesthetists were more accurate in their visual estimation of blood loss than were obstetricians. Conclusion: This study found the amount of blood loss during CS to be overestimated by the mathematical calculation and underestimated by obstetricians. However, the estimate given by anesthetists was close to that obtained by weighing pads. This underscores the need for more accurate methods of blood loss estimation in cesarean sections to be adopted.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOriginal Article;732-736-
dc.subjectBlood lossen_US
dc.subjectCaesarean deliveryen_US
dc.subjectHemoglobin concentrationen_US
dc.subjectObstetricianen_US
dc.subjectVisual estimationen_US
dc.titleEstimating blood loss during cesarean delivery: A comparison of methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Vol 17 No 5 (2022)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
732-736.pdf732-736942.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.