Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7072
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Albanna, Amr S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Atiah, Abdulqader K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Alamoudi, Saeed M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Khojah, Osama M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Alajmi, Rakan S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dabroom, Albara A. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-31T02:26:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-31T02:26:52Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1658-3612 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7072 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: Asthma is a chronic airway disorder associated with variable airflow limitations, which are triggered by different stimuli. The reversibility of airflow limitations reflects patients’ responses to the therapy with bronchodilators and improvements in airflow. This study aims to determine the treatment outcomes (improvements in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and the number of asthma exacerbations) associated with the presence of airflow reversibility. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 154 adults (>18 years) who were diagnosed with asthma and had pulmonary function testing (PFT) at a tertiary care centre in KSA between January 1st, 2014 and May 31st, 2019. Smokers and patients with comorbidities or medications that could affect PFT were excluded from the analysis. Patients were classified as having a reversible airflow limitation when they exhibited a postbronchodilator FEV1 increase of 12% and 200 mL. Exacerbations were defined as the need to use oral corticosteroids. Chi-square tests were used for comparative analyses. Results: From our cohort, 42 patients exhibited reversibility. In contrast, 112 patients did not show any sign of reversibility. Asthmatics with baseline reversible airflow limitations experienced significant worsening of FEV1 during the follow-up period compared with those with no reversibility, showing a mean difference of 19.96 mL (p ¼ 0.0206). There was no significant association between asthma reversibility and exacerbations (p ¼ 0.23). Conclusion: In our study, during the follow-up of patients with asthma, we found that the reversibility of airflow was associated with significantly worse FEV1, although this did not have a significant effect on exacerbations. Therefore, we recommend regular spirometry follow-ups, particularly for patients with significant airway reversibility. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Student Article;950-955 | - |
dc.subject | Asthma | en_US |
dc.subject | Exacerbations | en_US |
dc.subject | Forced expiratory volume 1 | en_US |
dc.subject | Pulmonary function test | en_US |
dc.subject | Reversibility | en_US |
dc.title | Treatment response among asthmatic patients with and without reversible airflow limitations | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Vol 16 No 6 (2021) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
950-955.pdf | 950-955 | 1.27 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.