Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/6809
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ali, Saqib | - |
dc.contributor.author | Farooq, Imran | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bugshan, Amr | - |
dc.contributor.author | Siddiqui, Intisar Ahmad | - |
dc.contributor.author | Al-Khalifa, Khalifa S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Al-Hariri, Mohammed | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-28T03:45:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-28T03:45:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1658-3612 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/6809 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: In this in vitro study, we aimed to analyse the enamel-remineralisation potential of propolis. Materials and methods: Twenty enamel blocks (N ¼ 20) were randomly divided into two groups (n ¼ 10). In group 1 (control), enamel blocks were brushed with artificial saliva (AS). In group 2, they were brushed with propolis oil. All the blocks were demineralised by exposing them to 6 wt% citric acid (pH: 2.2) for 5 min. Brushing was performed inside a tooth brushing simulation machine with manual toothbrushes. Each sample received 5,000 linear strokes. Surface microhardness analysis was performed for each sample at three time intervals (pre-demineralisation or baseline, postdemineralisation, and post-remineralisation) to obtain the Vickers hardness numbers (VHNs). Results: An enhancement in the microhardness of the enamel samples was observed after brushing with propolis oil when compared with brushing using AS alone. In group 1 (control group), the mean baseline VHN was 583.66. It decreased to 116.23 after demineralisation and increased to 184.02 after remineralisation. The mean baseline VHN of group 2 was 506.91. It decreased to 317.60 after demineralisation and increased to 435.19 after remineralisation. The VHN values of both the groups revealed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in inter-group and intra-group comparisons. Conclusion: Brushing of enamel blocks with propolis led to a greater enhancement in their microhardness levels when compared with the control group. Future studies are essential to validate the exact mechanism of the beneficial effects of propolis on enamel. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Experimental Article;283-287 | - |
dc.subject | Demineralisation | en_US |
dc.subject | Enamel | en_US |
dc.subject | Microhardness | en_US |
dc.subject | Propolis | en_US |
dc.subject | Remineralisation | en_US |
dc.title | Efficacy of propolis in remineralising artificially induced demineralisation of human enamel - An in-vitro study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Vol 16 No 2 (2021) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
283-287.pdf | 283-287 | 1.23 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.