Comparing the gender diversity and affiliation trends of the authors for two orthopaedics journals from the Arab world

Abstract

Objectives: Authorship trends, female authors’ contributions, and the collaboration among institutions have been a concern in the medical field. This study primarily aims to report and compare the number of authors per article and the prevalence of female authors by comparing two orthopaedics journals from the Arab world. The secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the characteristics of the authors’ affiliations and the pattern in institutions’ collaborations and contributions to the published articles. Methods: This cross-sectional study reviewed all articles (until July 2020) published in the Archives of the Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal (EOJ) (the official journal of the Egyptian Orthopaedic Association) and the Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research (JMSR) (the official journal of the Saudi Orthopaedic Association). Results: We evaluated 383 and 122 articles from the EOJ and JMSR, respectively. The average number of authors per article was significantly higher for JMSR (4.3 1.7) than EOJ (2.0 1.0); p ¼ 0.000. There was a significantly larger number of contributions by female authors in JMSR (75, 14.2%) than EOJ (2, 0.3%); p ¼ 0.000. The average number of institutions per article was significantly larger for JMSR (2.1 1.2) than EOJ (1.1 0.3); p ¼ 0.000. For the JMSR, the incidence of national institutions’ cooperation (27.9%) and international institutions’ contributions (53.3%) were significantly higher than their counterparts for the EOJd6% and 4.7%, respectively; p ¼ 0.000. Conclusion: The JMSR showed superiority regarding the number of authors per article and the prevalence of female authors. The incidence of national institutions’ cooperation and international contributions were higher in the JMSR compared with the EOJ.