Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5947
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWeaver, Connie-
dc.contributor.authorAhles, Sanne-
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Karen J.-
dc.contributor.authordkk.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-21T01:01:56Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-21T01:01:56Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5947-
dc.description.abstractCreating effective dietary guidance requires a rigorous evidence base that is predominantly developed from robust clinical trials or largescale cohort studies, with the quality of the data available depending on the completeness and accuracy of their reporting. An international group of academics from 14 institutions in 12 different countries and on 5 continents, working on behalf of the Federation of European Nutrition Societies within its “Improving Standards in the Science of Nutrition” initiative, reviewed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement checklist as it pertains to nutrition trials. This perspective piece documents the procedure followed to gain input and consensus on the checklist previously published by this group, including its presentation and interrogation at the International Union of Nutritional Sciences International Congress of Nutrition 2022 (IUNS-ICN 22), inputs from a survey of journal editors, and its piloting on 8 nutrition trials of diverse designs. Overall, the initiative has been met with considerable enthusiasm. At IUNS-ICN 22, refinements to our proposal were elicited through a World Caf e method discussion with participating nutrition scientists. The contributing journal editors provided valuable insights, and the discussion led to the development of a potential tool specific to assess adherence to the proposed nutrition extension checklist. The piloting of the proposed checklist provided evidence from real-life studies that reporting of nutrition trials can be improved. This initiative aims to stimulate further discussion and development of a CONSORT-nutrition-specific extension.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAdvances in Nutritionen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPerspective;100154-
dc.subjectguidelinesen_US
dc.subjectCONSORTen_US
dc.subjectnutrition trialsen_US
dc.subjectdietary interventionsen_US
dc.subjectreportingen_US
dc.subjectexpert opinionen_US
dc.titlePerspective: Peer Evaluation of Recommendations for CONSORT Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in Nutrition☆en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 15 NO 1 (2024)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
25. Perspective--Peer-Evaluation-of-Recommendations-for_Perspectives.pdf100154689.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.