Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5871
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO’Connor, Lauren E.-
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, Kelly A.-
dc.contributor.authorSmiljanec, Katarina-
dc.contributor.authordkk.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-20T04:32:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-20T04:32:36Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5871-
dc.description.abstractOur objective was to convene interdisciplinary experts from government, academia, and industry to develop a Research Roadmap to identify research priorities about processed food intake and risk for obesity and cardiometabolic diseases (CMD) among United States populations. We convened attendees at various career stages with diverse viewpoints in the field. We held a “Food Processing Primer” to build foundational knowledge of how and why foods are processed, followed by presentations about how processed foods may affect energy intake, obesity, and CMD risk. Breakout groups discussed potential mechanistic and confounding explanations for associations between processed foods and obesity and CMD risk. Facilitators created research questions (RQs) based on key themes from discussions. Different breakout groups convened to discuss what is known and unknown for each RQ and to develop sub-RQs to address gaps. Workshop attendees focused on ultra-processed foods (UPFs; Nova Group 4) because the preponderance of evidence is based on this classification system. Yet, heterogeneity and subjectivity in UPF classification was a challenge for RQ development. The 6 RQs were: 1) What objective methods or measures could further categorize UPFs, considering food processing, formulation, and the interaction of the two? 2) How can exposure assessment of UPF intake be improved? 3) Does UPF intake influence risk for obesity or CMDs, independent of diet quality? 4) What, if any, attributes of UPFs influence ingestive behavior and contribute to excess energy intake? 5) What, if any, attributes of UPFs contribute to clinically meaningful metabolic responses? 6) What, if any, external environmental factors lead people to consume high amounts of UPFs? Uncertainty and complexity around UPF intake warrant further complementary and interdisciplinary causal, mechanistic, and methodological research related to obesity and CMD risk to understand the utility of applying classification by degree of processing to foods in the United States.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAdvances in Nutritionen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPerspective;1255–1269-
dc.subjectultra-processed fooden_US
dc.subjectNova classification systemen_US
dc.subjectdietary assessmenten_US
dc.subjectingestive behavioren_US
dc.subjectcardiometabolic healthen_US
dc.subjectfood environmenten_US
dc.subjectbuilt environmenten_US
dc.subjectfood scienceen_US
dc.subjectfood technologyen_US
dc.subjectfood engineeringen_US
dc.titlePerspective: A Research Roadmap about Ultra-Processed Foods and Human Health for the United States Food System: Proceedings from an Interdisciplinary, Multi-Stakeholder Workshopen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 14 NO 6 (2023)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
22. PIIS2161831323013789-Perspectives.pdf2.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.