Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5845
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOster, Candice-
dc.contributor.authorBogomolova, Svetlana-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-20T03:03:14Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-20T03:03:14Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-30-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5845-
dc.description.abstractSocial prescribing generally involves referral from health services (e.g. primary care) to services provided by the community and voluntary sectors (e.g. housing or financial support; supports to address social isolation). Social prescribing, then, sits at the interface between health, community, and voluntary services and aims to address the lack of integration between services to better address people’s holistic needs. However, concerns have been raised internationally about the potential lateral effect of increased referrals on the capacity of the existing community and voluntary services.17 Brown et al.,18 for example, note “concerns that existing community assets may not be able to handle the increased demand without receiving additional resources and training” (p. 620). These concerns are also relevant to the Australian contexten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Healthen_US
dc.subjectsocial determinants of health,en_US
dc.subjectsocial prescribing,en_US
dc.subjectcommunity referral,en_US
dc.subjectnon-medical care,en_US
dc.subjectreferral to social services,en_US
dc.subjectpolicyen_US
dc.titlePotential lateral and upstream consequences in the development and implementation of social prescribing in Australiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 48 NO 7

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
12. Potential-lateral-and-upstream-consequences-in-th_2024_Australian-and-New-Ze.pdf111.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.