Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5786
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Nau, Tracy | - |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, William Bellew Ben J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bauman, Adrian | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-14T03:59:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-14T03:59:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-06 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5786 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: This study investigated the feasibility of establishing a comprehensive and standardised physical activity surveillance system (PASS) in Australia to guide policy and programs to address this public health priority. Methods: We gathered information about existing data and reporting obligations in relation to physical activity, by conducting cross-sectoral workshops for each state and territory. This information was synthesised by sector/domain using the socioecological model. We developed a set of potential PASS indicators for feedback from the policymakers in the National Physical Activity Network. Results: Jurisdictions identified existing physical activity-relevant surveillance measures across socioecological levels and sectors. The most common were individual behavioural measures; less common were interpersonal, settings, environmental, and policy measures. Feedback was gathered from policymakers about model indicators that could be considered in future discussions. Conclusions: Our findings reveal areas where data availability is most widespread as well as areas of deficiency. Although this process identified relevant cross-sectoral indicators, further feasibility assessment will require national-level discussions, cross-agency planning, and leadership by Federal and State governments to progress PASS discussions further. Implications for public health: The existing physical activity surveillance system in Australia is fragmented and lacks nationwide standardisation. Most physical activity surveillance focuses on individual behaviours, and limited monitoring occurs of broader elements of the “physical activity system.” Improvements will contribute to more informed and accountable decision-making and enable more effective monitoring of progress at multiple levels towards achieving state and national physical activity goals. Policymakers need to embrace this agenda and further the discussions on the scope, shape, and structure of a physical activity surveillance system. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Chronic Disease Prevention and Control;100045 | - |
dc.title | Formative assessment: Is Australia ready for a physical activity surveillance system? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | VOL 47 NO 3 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
100045 Formative-assessment--Is-Australia-ready-for_2023_Australian-and-New-Zealand.pdf | 100045 | 789.17 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.