Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5222
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Connolly, Gavin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Clark, Caroline M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Campbell, Robyn E | - |
dc.contributor.author | Byers, Adam W | - |
dc.contributor.author | Reed, Jason B | - |
dc.contributor.author | Campbell, Wayne W | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-02T04:31:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-02T04:31:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5222 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This scoping review was conducted to systematically search and chronicle scientific literature pertinent to poultry intake and human health. The protocol (uploaded to Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/2k7bj/) was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. Articles with observational and experimental research, narrative and systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were included. Among 13,141 articles identified, 525 met inclusion criteria. Among these 525 articles, 212 focused on cancer morbidity and mortality; 41 on cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality; 52 on CVD risk factors; 32 on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) morbidity and mortality; 33 on T2DM risk factors; and 42 on body weight and body composition. An “Other” category (181 articles) included nutrient status, psychological well-being/mental health, cognition, microbiome, chronic kidney disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, skin disorders, and fertility, among others. Among the 525 included articles, 366 were observational, 64 were experimental, and 76 were reviews and meta-analyses. Eighty-three percent of articles focused on adults or older adults. A paucity of research exists to support poultry as health-promoting foods, with most research only indirectly assessing poultry intake compared with other foods of interest (e.g., red meats or plant-based protein foods). No randomized controlled trials and only 1% of OBS assessed the influence of processed poultry intake on human health. In the future, the relative health effects of consuming poultry will be compared with a widening array of traditional and new protein-rich food products, necessitating the need for research to assess poultry as foods of choice. Science and health professionals, the poultry industry, and the public will benefit from new observational and experimental research to address cutting-edge scientific, public policy, and consumer topics pertinent to poultry intake and human health | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | chicken | en_US |
dc.subject | turkey | en_US |
dc.subject | animal-based protein sources | en_US |
dc.subject | cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | type 2 diabetes | en_US |
dc.subject | T2DM | en_US |
dc.subject | cardiovascular disease | en_US |
dc.subject | CVD | en_US |
dc.title | Poultry Consumption and Human Health: How Much Is Really Known? A Systematically Searched Scoping Review and Research Perspective | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | VOL 13 NO 6 2022 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2115-2124.pdf | 255.23 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.