Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5166
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSpil, Maureen K-
dc.contributor.authorEnglish, LauralK-
dc.contributor.authorRaghavan, Ramkripa-
dc.contributor.authorCallahan, Emily-
dc.contributor.authorGüngör, Darcy-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-26T03:45:50Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-26T03:45:50Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5166-
dc.description.abstractTheUSDA’sNutritionEvidenceSystematicReview(NESR)teamconductsfood-andnutrition-relatedsystematicreviewsusedtoinformUSFederal guidelinesandprograms,includingtheDietaryGuidelinesforAmericans.NESR’ssystematicreviewmethodologyincludesasteptogradethestrength oftheevidenceunderlyingconclusionstatements,whichiscriticalforensuringthatendusersunderstandthelevelofcertaintyinconclusionswhen usingthemtomakedecisions.Overtime,NESRhasensureditsgradingprocessnotonlyremainsstateoftheartbutisalsodesignedspecificallyfor systematicreviewsthatinformFederalguidelinesandprogramsonnutritionandpublichealth.TheNESRgradingprocessusedbythe2020Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee included 5 grading elements: risk of bias, consistency, directness, precision, and generalizability. Evidence was groupedbystudydesignandassessedagainsttheseelements,andthegradeassignedtotheentirebodyofevidencetookintoconsiderationthe strengthsandlimitationsofeachdesign.Basedonthisassessment,1of4gradeswasassigned:strong,moderate,limited,orgradenotassignable. The grade was clearly communicated by integrating specific language into each conclusion statement (e.g., “strong evidence demonstrates”or “limited evidence suggests”), and supported by rationale documented in the review. NESR’s grading process aligns with approaches used by otherorganizationsthatconductsystematicreviews,whileretainingaspectsuniquetoNESR’sroleininformingFederalnutritionandpublichealth guidelines and programs. It provides a framework that promotes consistency in grading across food- and nutrition-related reviews, while offering flexibility that allows for thorough consideration of the body of evidence underlying an individual conclusion statement. NESR’s rigorous and transparentmethodsforgradingthestrengthofevidenceinfood-andnutrition-relatedsystematicreviewsensurethatdecisionsrelatedtonutrition andpublichealtharebasedonthestrongestavailableevidenceen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectgradingen_US
dc.subjectNESRen_US
dc.subjectnutrition evidence systematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectstrength of evidenceen_US
dc.subjectsystematicreviewsen_US
dc.subject,Dietary Guidelinesfor Americans,publichealthen_US
dc.subjectFederalfoodpolicyaen_US
dc.titlePerspective:USDANutritionEvidenceSystematic ReviewMethodology:GradingtheStrengthof EvidenceinNutrition-andPublicHealth–Related SystematicReviewsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 13 NO 4 2022

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
982-991.pdf206.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.