Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5090
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSun, Tingting-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yabing-
dc.contributor.authorDing, Lin-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yonggang-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Tao-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Qian-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-19T03:01:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-19T03:01:30Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn2161-8313-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5090-
dc.description.abstractThere is emerging evidence of associations between intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), those that include various forms of added sugar, and increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) but whether consumption of other dietary sources of fructose affects CVD is unclear. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to examine potential dose-response relationships between such foods and CVD, coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke morbidity and mortality. We systematically searched the literature indexed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from the inception of each database to February 10, 2022. We included prospective cohort studies analyzing the association between at least 1 dietary source of fructose and CVD, CHD, and stroke. Based on data from 64 included studies, summary HRs and 95% CIs were calculated for the highest intake category compared with the lowest, and dose-response analyses were performed. Of all fructose sources examined, only SSB intakes showed positive associations with CVD, giving summary HRs per 250 mL/d increase of 1.10 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.17) for CVD, 1.11 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.17) for CHD, 1.08 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.13) for stroke morbidity, and 1.06 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.10) for CVD mortality. Conversely, 3 dietary sources showed protective associations: between fruits and CVD morbidity (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96, 0.98), fruits and CVD mortality (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.92, 0.97), yogurt and CVD mortality (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.99), and breakfast cereals and CVD mortality (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.70, 0.90). All these relationships were linear except for fruit, which was J-shaped: CVD morbidity was the lowest at 200 g/d and there was no protective association above 400 g/d. These findings indicate that the adverse associations between SSBs and CVD, CHD, and stroke morbidity and mortality do not extend to other dietary sources of fructose. The food matrix seemed to modify the association between fructose and cardiovascular outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAdvances in Nutritionen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReview;256-269-
dc.subjectfructoseen_US
dc.subjectdietsen_US
dc.subjectcardiovascular diseaseen_US
dc.subjectmeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectdose responseen_US
dc.titleThe Relationship Between Major Food Sources of Fructose and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 14 NO 2 (2023)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
256-269.pdf1.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.