Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5065
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJOverwyk, Katherine-
dc.contributor.authorQuader, Zerleen S-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-17T03:18:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-17T03:18:38Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5065-
dc.description.abstractAs the science surroundingpopulation sodium reduction evolves, monitoring and evaluating new studies on intake and health can help increase ourunderstandingoftheassociatedbenefitsandrisks.Herewedescribeasystematicreviewofrecentstudiesonsodiumintakeandhealth,examine the risk of bias (ROB) of selected studies, and provide direction for future research. Seven online databases were searched monthly from January 2015toDecember2019.Weselectedhumanstudiesthatmetspecifiedpopulation,intervention,comparison,outcome,time,setting/studydesign (PICOTS) criteria and abstracted attributes related to the study population, design, intervention, exposure, and outcomes, and evaluated ROB for thesubsetofstudiesonsodiumintakeandcardiovasculardiseaserisksorindicators.Of41,601abstractsreviewed,231studieswereidentifiedthat metthePICOTScriteriaandROBwasassessedfor54studies.Onehundredandfifty-seven(68%)studieswereobservationaland161(70%)focused on the general population. Five types of sodium interventions and a variety of urinary and dietary measurement methods were used to establish and quantify sodium intake. Five observational studies used multiple 24-h urine collections to assess sodium intake. Evidence mainly focused on cardiovascular-relatedindicators(48%)butencompassedanassortmentofoutcomes.StudiesvariedinROBdomainsand87%ofstudiesevaluated were missing information on ≥1 domains. Two or more studies on each of 12 outcomes (e.g., cognition) not previously included in systematic reviews and 9 new studies at low ROB suggest the need for ongoing or updated systematic reviews of evidence on sodium intake and health. Summarizing evidence from assessments on sodium and health outcomes was limited by the various methods used to measure sodium intake and outcomes, as well as lack of details related to study design and conduct. In line with research recommendations identified by the National AcademiesofScience,futureresearchisneededtoidentifyandstandardizemethodsformeasuringsodiumintakeen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Nutritionen_US
dc.subjectdietarysodiumen_US
dc.subjecthealthindicatorsen_US
dc.subjectreductionen_US
dc.subjectriskofbiasen_US
dc.titleDietarySodiumIntakeandHealthIndicators: ASystematicReviewofPublishedLiterature betweenJanuary2015andDecember2019en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 11 NO 5 (2020)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Pages 1174-1200.pdf1.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.