Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5015
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Blue, Malia NM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tinsley, Grant M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ryan, Eric D | - |
dc.contributor.author | Smith-Ryan, Abbie E | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-15T07:53:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-15T07:53:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5015 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Multi-compartment body-composition models that divide the body into its multiple constituents are the criterion method for measuring body fat percentage, fat mass, and fat-free mass. However, 2- and 3-compartment body-composition devices such as air displacement plethysmography (ADP), DXA, and bioelectrical impedance devices [bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)] are more commonly used. Accurate measures depend on several assumptions, including constant hydration, body proportion, fat-free body density, and population characteristics. Investigations evaluating body composition in racial and ethnic minorities have observed differences in the aforementioned components between cohorts. Consequently, for racial/ethnic minority populations, estimates of body composition may not be valid. The purpose of this review was to comprehensively examine the validity of common body-composition devices in multi-ethnic samples (samples including>1 race/ethnicity) and in African-American, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American populations. Based on the literature, DXA produces valid results in multi-ethnic samples and ADP is valid for Hispanic and African American males when utilizing race-specific equations. However, for DXA and ADP, there is a need for validity investigations that include larger, more racially diverse samples, specifically including Hispanic/Latinx, Asian, Native American adults, and African-American females. Technology has advanced significantly since initial validity studies were conducted; therefore, conclusions are based on outdated models and software. For BIA, body-composition measures may be valid in a multi-ethnic sample, but the literature demonstrates disparate results between races/ethnicities. For BIA and ADP, the majority of studies have utilized DXA or hydrostatic weighing as the criterion to determine validity; additional studies utilizing a multi-compartment model criterion are essential to evaluate accuracy. Validity studies evaluating more recent technology in larger, more racially/ethnically diverse samples may improve our ability to select the appropriate method to accurately assess body composition in each racial/ethnic population | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Advances in Nutrition | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Review;1854-1862 | - |
dc.subject | body fat percentage | en_US |
dc.subject | fat-free mass | en_US |
dc.subject | validation | en_US |
dc.subject | multi-ethnic | en_US |
dc.subject | African American | en_US |
dc.subject | Hispanic | en_US |
dc.subject | Asian | en_US |
dc.subject | Native American | en_US |
dc.title | Validity of Body-Composition Methods across Racial and Ethnic Populations | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | VOL 12 NO 5 (2021) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1854-1862.pdf | 230 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.