Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4956
Title: Ratio of Vascular Pedicle Width and Thoracic Diameter to Differentiate Cardiogenic and Non-Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
Authors: Afifi, Rahmi
Fachri, Achmad
Sjarifuddin Madjid, Amir
Prihartono, Joedo
Prasetyo, Marcel
Christian, Andreas
Keywords: blood vessels
critical illness
diagnostic imaging
intensive care units
pulmonary edema
radiography
Issue Date: 2022
Abstract: Ratio of Vascular Pedicle Width and Thoracic Diameter to Differentiate Cardiogenic and Non-Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema Rahmi Afifi1*, Achmad Fachri1, Amir Sjarifuddin Madjid2, Joedo Prihartono3, Marcel Prasetyo1, Andreas Christian1 1Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia–Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia 2Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia–Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia 3Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia Abstract Background: Excess intravascular volume evaluation is essential in the intensive care unit (ICU); however, clinical information to differentiate cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema has been proven ineffective. Thus, this study aimed to distinguish cardiogenic from non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema using the ratio of vascular pedicle width (VPW) to thoracic diameter (VPTR). Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted based on secondary data from chest radiographs of 100 patients with clinical symptoms of pulmonary edema in the ICU from January 2013 to December 2015. Cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema were distinguished using VPW and cardiothoracic ratio measurements (CTR). VPTR was measured to differentiate between the two types of pulmonary edema, and the cut-off value was obtained using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: This study revealed a prevalence of 21% and 79% for cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema, respectively. A VPTR cut-off value of 25.1% with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 86%, may distinguish cardiogenic from non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Conclusions: VPTR is an alternative method to differentiate between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema, and this ratio measurement is useful in cases where radiograph films are not standardized. Keywords: blood vessels, critical illness, diagnostic imaging, intensive care units, pulmonary edema, radiography
URI: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4956
Appears in Collections:VOL 26 NO 3 2022

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
8.pdf359.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.