Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4861
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Lindsay H-
dc.contributor.authorCarriquiry, Alicia L-
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Suzanne P-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-13T02:55:24Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-13T02:55:24Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4861-
dc.description.abstractTwo core nutrient intake reference values (NRVs) are required for assessing the adequacy and safety of nutrient intakes for population groups: the average requirement (AR) and the tolerable upper level of intake (UL). Applications of such assessments include providing advice to improve intakes, formulating complementary foods, estimating the amounts of nutrients to be added to fortified foods and monitoring changes in intake, and product labeling at the global, national, or regional level. However, there is a lack of unity across country-level organizations in the methodological approach used to derive NRVs, and ARs and ULs are lacking in many compilations, thus limiting the ability to assess nutrient intakes for their population groups. Because physiological requirements vary little across populations globally, and setting reference values requires determining an acceptable level of uncertainty, it is feasible to adapt current recommendations from different sources to harmonize these core reference values. The objective of this review is to demonstrate an approach for harmonizing the NRVs for ARs (here termed “H-ARs”) and ULs (“H-ULs”) that can be applied on a global scale to assessing intakes across populations. The approach incorporates the framework and terminology recommended by reports from the United Nations University, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), the Institute of Medicine (IOM), and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). After reviewing available alternatives, the proposed harmonized values were selected from standards set by EFSA (for Europe) and the IOM (for the United States and Canada), giving priority to those published most recently. Justifications for the proposed values are presented, along with discussion of their limitations. Ideally, these methods should be further reviewed by an international group of experts. Meanwhile, the H-ARs and H-ULs suggested in this review can be used to assess intakes of populations for many applications in global and regional contextsen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.subjectnutrient reference valueen_US
dc.subjectnutrient intakerecommendationsen_US
dc.subjectnutrient requirementen_US
dc.subjectharmonized averagerequirementen_US
dc.titlePerspective: Proposed Harmonized Nutrient Reference Values for Populationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 11 NO 3 (2020)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
469-483.pdf601.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.