Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4820
Title: The Effect of Aerobic and Resistance Training and Combined Exercise Modalities on Subcutaneous Abdominal Fat: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical TrialsThe Effect of Aerobic and Resistance Training and Combined Exercise Modalities on Subcutaneous Abdominal Fat: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Authors: Yarizadeh, Habib
Eftekhar, Reza
Anjom-Shoae, Javad
Speakman, John R
Djafarian, Kurosh
Keywords: aerobic exercise
resistance training
combined exercise
subcutaneous abdominal fat
meta-analysis
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: Advances in Nutrition
Series/Report no.: Review;179-196
Abstract: Subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SAT), is the largest fat depot and major provider of free fatty acids to the liver. Abdominal fat is indirectly (via increased levels of low-grade inflammation) correlated with many of the adverse health effects of obesity. Although exercise is one of the most prominent components of obesity management, its effects on SAT are still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the independent effects of aerobic training (AT) and resistance training (RT) modalities and combined exercise modalities on SAT in adults. PubMed, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar were searched to find relevant publications up to November 2018. The effect sizes were represented as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CIs. Between-study heterogeneity was examined using the I2 test. Overall, 43 identified trials that enrolled 3552 subjects (2684 women) were included. After removal of outliers, combining effect sizes indicated a significant effect of AT (WMD: −13.05 cm2; 95% CI: −18.52, −7.57; P < 0.001), RT (WMD:−5.39 cm2; 95% CI:−9.66,−1.12; P=0.01), and combined exercise training (CExT;WMD:−28.82 cm2; 95% CI:−30.83,−26.81; P< 0.001) on SAT relative to control groups. Pooled effect sizes demonstrated a significant effect of AT on SAT comparedwith a CExT group (WMD: 11.07 cm2; 95% CI: 1.81, 20.33; P = 0.01). However, when comparing the AT and RT groups, no significant difference was seen in SAT (WMD: −0.73 cm2; 95% CI: −4.50, 3.04; P = 0.70). Meta-analysis of relevant trials indicated that AT, RT, and CExT lead to SAT reduction. Aerobic exercise was shown to produce greater efficacy in decreasing SAT.
URI: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4820
Appears in Collections:VOL 12 NO 1 (2021)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
179-196.pdf710.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.