Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4809
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hruby, Adela | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jacques, Paul F | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-12T03:20:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-12T03:20:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4809 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Understanding the health effects of protein intake is bedeviled by a number of factors, including protein quality and source. In addition, different units, including grams, grams per kilogram body weight (g/kg BW), and percent energy, may contribute to confusion about protein’s effects on health, especially BW-based units in increasingly obese populations. We aimed to review the literature and to conduct a modeling demonstration of various units of protein intake in relation to markers of cardiometabolic health. Data from the Framingham Heart Study Offspring (n = 1847; 60.3 y; 62.5% women) and Third Generation (n= 2548; 46.2 y; 55.3% women) cohorts and the NHANES 2003–04 (n= 1625; 46.2 y; 49.7% women) and 2005–06 (n = 1347; 43.7 y; 49.5% women) cycles were used to model cross-sectional associations between 7 protein units (grams, percent energy, g/kg ideal BW, g/kg actual BW, BW-adjusted g/kg actual BW, g/kg lean BW, and g/kg fat-free BW) and 9 cardiometabolic outcomes (fasting glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, BMI, waist circumference, and estimated glomerular filtration rate). The literature review indicated the use of myriad units of protein intake, with differential results on cardiometabolic outcomes. The modeling demonstration showed units expressed in BW were confounded by BW, irrespective of outcome. Units expressed in grams, percent energy, and ideal BWshowed similar results, with or without adjustment for body size. After adjusting for BW, results of units expressed in BWaligned with results of grams, percent energy, and ideal BW. In conclusion, protein intake in cardiometabolic health appears to depend on protein’s unit of expression. Authors should be specific about the use of WHO (g/kg ideal BW) compared with US (g/kg actual BW) units, and ideally use gram or percent energy in observational studies. In populations where overweight/obesity are prevalent, intake based on actual BW should be reevaluated | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Advances in Nutrition | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Perspective;71-88 | - |
dc.subject | National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey | en_US |
dc.subject | Framingham Heart Study | en_US |
dc.subject | protein | en_US |
dc.subject | dietary protein | en_US |
dc.subject | cardiometabolic health | en_US |
dc.subject | glucose | en_US |
dc.subject | blood pressure | en_US |
dc.subject | kidney function | en_US |
dc.subject | cholesterol | en_US |
dc.subject | BMI | en_US |
dc.subject | waist circumference | en_US |
dc.title | Protein Intake and Human Health: Implications of Units of Protein Intake | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | VOL 12 NO 1 (2021) |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.