Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4572
Title: Australians underestimate social compliance with coronavirus restrictions: findings from a national survey
Authors: Leviston, Zoe
Stanley, Samantha K.
Walker, Iain
Keywords: coronavirus
COVID-19
uniqueness bias
better-than-average effect
Issue Date: Jun-2022
Publisher: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Series/Report no.: COVID-19;304-306
Abstract: Objective: We assessed differences between Australians’ perceptions of their own compliance with coronavirus restrictions and their perceptions of community compliance. Methods: We surveyed a national quota sample of 1,691 Australians in August and September 2020. Participants reported their level of compliance with coronavirus restrictions and estimated compliance from others in their state/territory. Results: Overwhelmingly, most people reported complying with restrictions. They believed their fellow community members were much less compliant. Age and other demographics were only weakly associated with self-reported compliance and perceptions of others’ compliance. Conclusions: The results are consistent with prevalent cognitive biases, including the tendency to believe one is better-than-average, and to more easily recall instances of deviances from social norms. Implications for public health: We recommend public health messaging avoids amplifying instances of social transgressions of coronavirus restrictions. Instead, the widespread nature of social compliance with restrictions across the country should be emphasised.
URI: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4572
ISSN: 1753-6405.13195
Appears in Collections:VOL 46 NO 3

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
304-306.pdf125.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.