Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4503
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sun, Tianze | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, Carmen C.W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gartner, Coral | - |
dc.contributor.author | Connor, Jason P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hall, Wayne D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, Janni | - |
dc.contributor.author | Stjepanović, Daniel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Gary C.K. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-10T03:34:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-10T03:34:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1753-6405.13143 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4503 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: In June 2020, the Australian Government announced that personal importation of nicotine vaping products (NVP) would be prohibited, pending a 12-month classification and regulation review by the Therapeutic Goods Administration. This brief report examines the themes of responses on Twitter to this announcement. Methods: Simple random sampling was used to retrieve tweets containing keywords from 19 to 26 June 2020. Tweets were manually coded and descriptive statistics calculated for themes and policy position. Results: The vast majority of the 1,168 tweets were anti-policy. Themes included: criticism towards government (59.8%), activism against NVP restriction (38%), potential adverse consequences (30.8%) and support for NVP restriction (1.4%). Tweets that identified potential adverse consequences of NVP restriction cited: smoking relapse for individuals currently using NVPs (75.6%); the impact of policy enforcement (8.6%); illicit market (8.3%); panic buying (3.6%); difficulty obtaining prescriptions (2.8%); and impacts on NVP businesses (2.8%). Conclusion: Tweets predominately objected to the policy announcement. Approximately three-quarters of tweets that cited potential adverse consequences of the policy mentioned smoking relapse as their primary concern. Implications for public health: User-generated content on Twitter was primarily used to lobby against the proposed policy, which was subsequently amended. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Nicotine Use;543-545 | - |
dc.subject | e-cigarette | en_US |
dc.subject | vaping | en_US |
dc.subject | nicotine | en_US |
dc.subject | Australia | en_US |
dc.subject | attitudes | en_US |
dc.subject | regulation | en_US |
dc.subject | policy | en_US |
dc.title | Reactions on Twitter towards Australia’s proposed import restriction on nicotine vaping products: a thematic analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | VOL 45 NO 6 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
543-545.pdf | 108.97 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.