Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4491
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAljuraiban, Ghadeer S-
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Rachel-
dc.contributor.authorGriep, Linda M Oude-
dc.contributor.authorOkuda, Nagako-
dc.contributor.authorSteffen, Lyn M-
dc.contributor.authorHorn, Linda Van-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Queenie-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-10T02:41:35Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-10T02:41:35Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationVolume 11 ¦ Issue 1 ¦ 2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4491-
dc.description.abstractHealthy dietary habits are the cornerstone of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Numerous researchers have developed diet quality indices to help evaluate and compare diet quality across and within various populations. The availability of these new indices raises questions regarding the best selection relevant to a given population. In this perspective, we critically evaluate a priori–defined dietary indices commonly applied in epidemiological studies of CVD risk and mortality. A systematic literature search identified 59 observational studies that applied a priori–defined diet quality indices to CVD risk factors and/or CVD incidence and/or CVD mortality. Among 31 different indices, these scores were categorized as follows: 1) those based on country-specific dietary patterns, 2) those adapted from distinct dietary guidelines, and 3) novel scores specific to key dietrelated factors associated with CVD risk. The strengths and limitations of these indices are described according to index components, calculation methods, and the application of these indices to different population groups. Also, the importance of identifying methodological challenges faced by researchers when applying an index are considered, such as selection and weighting of food groups within a score, since food groups are not necessarily equivalent in their associations with CVD. The lack of absolute cutoff values, emphasis on increasing healthy food without limiting unhealthy food intake, and absence of validation of scores with biomarkers or other objective diet assessment methods further complicate decisions regarding the best indices to use. Future research should address these limitations, consider cross-cultural and other differences between population groups, and identify translational challenges inherent in attempting to apply a relevant diet quality index for use in CVD prevention at a population leveen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Nutritionen_US
dc.subjectcardiovascular diseaseen_US
dc.subjectCVD risk factorsen_US
dc.subjectblood pressureen_US
dc.subjectdiet quality scoreen_US
dc.subjectdiet index,en_US
dc.subjectdietary patternsen_US
dc.titlePerspective: The Application of A Priori Diet Quality Scores to Cardiovascular Disease Risk—A Critical Evaluation of Current Scoring Systemsen_US
dc.title.alternativeAdvances in Nutritionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 11 NO 1 (2020)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10-24.pdf2.42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.