Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4316
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Saxby, Karinna | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nickson, Carolyn | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mann, G. Bruce | - |
dc.contributor.author | Velentzis, Louiza | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bromley, Hannah L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Procopio, Pietro | - |
dc.contributor.author | Canfell, Karen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Petrie, Dennis | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-03T04:32:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-03T04:32:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-06 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1753-6405.12976 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4316 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To determine the government and out-of-pocket community costs (out-of-hospital medical services and prescription medicines) associated with screen-detected and communitydetected cancers (i.e. cancers detected outside of Australia’s organised screening program [BreastScreen]). Methods: We analyse administrative data on government-subsidised medical services and prescription medicines for 568 Victorian women diagnosed with breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Using multivariable regression analysis, we estimate the government and out-of-pocket community costs incurred in the three years after diagnosis for screendetected cancers and community-detected cancers. Additionally, we estimate the government costs associated with diagnosis within and outside of BreastScreen. Results: Average government costs for breast cancer diagnosis were similar within and outside of BreastScreen [$808 (lower limit 676; upper limit 940) vs $837 (95%CI 671; 1,003) respectively]; however, women with community-detected cancers incurred an additional $254 (95%CI 175; 332) out-of-pocket. Controlling for differences in known cancer characteristics, compared to screen-detected cancers, community-detected breast cancers were associated with an additional $2,622 (95%CI 644; 4,776) in government expenditure in the three years following diagnosis. Adverse cancer characteristics that were more prevalent in community-detected cancers (high grade, lymph node involvement, HER2 positive receptor status) were associated with increased government and out-of-pocket costs. Conclusions: Community-detected breast cancers were associated with increased government and out-of-pocket costs. Implications for public health: These costs should be considered when evaluating current and alternative breast cancer screening strategies. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Public Health;219-226 | - |
dc.subject | breast cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | screening | en_US |
dc.subject | out-of-pocket | en_US |
dc.subject | costs | en_US |
dc.subject | healthcare use | en_US |
dc.title | The financial impact of a breast cancer detected within and outside of screening: lessons from the Australian Lifepool cohort | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | VOL 44 NO 3 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
219-226.pdf | 245.68 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.