Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4316
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaxby, Karinna-
dc.contributor.authorNickson, Carolyn-
dc.contributor.authorMann, G. Bruce-
dc.contributor.authorVelentzis, Louiza-
dc.contributor.authorBromley, Hannah L.-
dc.contributor.authorProcopio, Pietro-
dc.contributor.authorCanfell, Karen-
dc.contributor.authorPetrie, Dennis-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-03T04:32:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-03T04:32:30Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-
dc.identifier.issn1753-6405.12976-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4316-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the government and out-of-pocket community costs (out-of-hospital medical services and prescription medicines) associated with screen-detected and communitydetected cancers (i.e. cancers detected outside of Australia’s organised screening program [BreastScreen]). Methods: We analyse administrative data on government-subsidised medical services and prescription medicines for 568 Victorian women diagnosed with breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Using multivariable regression analysis, we estimate the government and out-of-pocket community costs incurred in the three years after diagnosis for screendetected cancers and community-detected cancers. Additionally, we estimate the government costs associated with diagnosis within and outside of BreastScreen. Results: Average government costs for breast cancer diagnosis were similar within and outside of BreastScreen [$808 (lower limit 676; upper limit 940) vs $837 (95%CI 671; 1,003) respectively]; however, women with community-detected cancers incurred an additional $254 (95%CI 175; 332) out-of-pocket. Controlling for differences in known cancer characteristics, compared to screen-detected cancers, community-detected breast cancers were associated with an additional $2,622 (95%CI 644; 4,776) in government expenditure in the three years following diagnosis. Adverse cancer characteristics that were more prevalent in community-detected cancers (high grade, lymph node involvement, HER2 positive receptor status) were associated with increased government and out-of-pocket costs. Conclusions: Community-detected breast cancers were associated with increased government and out-of-pocket costs. Implications for public health: These costs should be considered when evaluating current and alternative breast cancer screening strategies.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Healthen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPublic Health;219-226-
dc.subjectbreast canceren_US
dc.subjectscreeningen_US
dc.subjectout-of-pocketen_US
dc.subjectcostsen_US
dc.subjecthealthcare useen_US
dc.titleThe financial impact of a breast cancer detected within and outside of screening: lessons from the Australian Lifepool cohorten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 44 NO 3

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
219-226.pdf245.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.