Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4289
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVicendese, Don-
dc.contributor.authorMarvelde, Luc Te-
dc.contributor.authorMcNair, Peter D.-
dc.contributor.authorWhitfield, Kathryn-
dc.contributor.authorEnglish, Dallas R.-
dc.contributor.authorTaieb, Souhaib Ben-
dc.contributor.authorHyndman, Rob J.-
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Robert-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-03T03:13:18Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-03T03:13:18Z-
dc.date.issued2020-02-
dc.identifier.issn1753-6405.12932-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4289-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Length of hospital stay (LOS) is considered a vital component for successful colorectal surgery treatment. Evidence of an association between hospital surgery volume and LOS has been mixed. Data modelling techniques may give inconsistent results that adversely impact conclusions. This study applied techniques to overcome possible modelling drawbacks. Method: An additive quantile regression model formulated to isolate hospital contextual effects was applied to every colorectal surgery for cancer conducted in Victoria, Australia, between 2005 and 2015, involving 28,343 admissions in 90 Victorian hospitals. The model compared hospitals’ operational efficiencies regarding LOS. Results: Hospital LOS operational efficiencies for colorectal cancer surgery varied markedly between the 90 hospitals and were independent of volume. This result was adjusted for pertinent patient and hospital characteristics. Conclusion: No evidence was found that higher annual surgery volume was associated with lower LOS for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Our model showed strong evidence that differences in LOS efficiency between hospitals was driven by hospital contextual effects that were not predicted by provider volume. Further study is required to elucidate these inherent differences between hospitals. Implications for public health: Our model indicated improved efficiency would benefit the patient and medical system by lowering LOS and reducing expenditure by more than $3 million per year.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Healthen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEpidemiology;73-82-
dc.subjectsurgeryen_US
dc.subjectcolorectalen_US
dc.subjectcanceren_US
dc.subjectlength of stayen_US
dc.subjectquantile regressionen_US
dc.titleHospital characteristics, rather than surgical volume, predict length of stay following colorectal cancer surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 44 NO 1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
73-82.pdf757.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.