Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2830
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Abike, Faruk | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gemici, Ali | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-12T00:23:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-12T00:23:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-04 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2830 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Is robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy superior to laparoscopic myomectomy? Faruk Abike1 , Ali Gemici2 , Fulya Gokalp Yavuz3 , Bashar Sammour1 , Ömer Lütfi Tapısız2,4,* , İlkkan Dünder1 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Acıbadem Taksim Hospital, Acibadem Healthcare Group, 34373 Istanbul, Turkey 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guven Hospital, 06540 Ankara, Turkey 3Department of Statistics, Faculty of Art and Sciences, Middle East Technical University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Yuksek Ihtisas University, 06520 Ankara, Turkey *Correspondence: omertapisiz@yahoo.com.tr (Ömer Lütfi Tapısız) Academic Editor: Michael H. Dahan Submitted: 15 July 2021 Revised: 27 September 2021 Accepted: 13 October 2021 Published: 10 May 2022 Abstract Background: To determine whether RLM (Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy) or LM (Laparoscopic Myomectomy) provides better surgical and post-operative outcomes for patients willing to have minimally invasive myomectomy. Methods: In this retrospective cohort (Class II-2) analysis, all patients who underwent RLM and LM by a single expertise surgical team from January 1st, 2018 to March 31st, 2020 were identified. The patients’ characteristics, operative data, and post-operative outcomes were collected and statistically analyzed. Results: A total of 118 patients with an indication of myomectomy were included, 39 of whom underwent RLM, while 79 underwent LM. There were no significant differences among the groups in demographic characteristics (p > 0.05). RLM was associated with lower estimated blood loss (55.00 ± 39.11 mL vs. 110.80 ± 74.72 mL, respectively, p < 0.001) and larger myoma size (6.92 ± 1.88 cm vs. 6.00 ± 2.07 cm, p < 0.001) compared with LM. No significant differences were noted between the groups for other parameters (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Although RLM was associated with significantly less blood loss, this difference did not entail clinical implications. In general, both methods demonstrated similar clinical outcomes. For cost effectiveness, LM appears to outperform RLM, particularly in experienced hands. Keywords: Minimally invasive surgery; Laparoscopic myomectomy; Robot-assisted myomectomy; Intra-operative; Post-operative; Outcomes | en_US |
dc.subject | Minimally invasive surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | Laparoscopic myomectomy | en_US |
dc.subject | Robot-assisted myomectomy | en_US |
dc.subject | Intra-operative | en_US |
dc.subject | Post-operative | en_US |
dc.subject | Outcomes | en_US |
dc.title | Is robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy superior to laparoscopic myomectomy? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | 2. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2709-0094-49-5-109.pdf | 4.94 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.