Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2752
Title: Can hysteroscopy be substituted to hysterosalpingography in the assessment of infertility? Methods of showing tubal transition as hysteroscopic
Authors: Yanar, Buket Aydın
Pek, Eren
Keywords: Hysteroscopy
Hysterosalpingography
Shawki-bubble test
Methylene blue test
Tubal passage
Issue Date: Feb-2022
Abstract: Can hysteroscopy be substituted to hysterosalpingography in the assessment of infertility? Methods of showing tubal transition as hysteroscopic Buket Aydın Yanar1 , Eren Pek1,*, Mesut A. Unsal1 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17020 Canakkale, Turkey *Correspondence: drerenpek@hotmail.com (Eren Pek) Academic Editor: Marco Noventa Submitted: 17 January 2021 Revised: 11 May 2021 Accepted: 30 July 2021 Published: 12 January 2022 Abstract Background: The main goal of this study was to prove that hysteroscopy is a superior method compared to hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal passage and the uterine cavity in infertile women. Methods: The study was carried out on 30 volunteer women for whom evaluation of the uterine cavity and transit through the tubules was required due to infertility. In the evaluation of the hysteroscopic tubal passage, a 6Fr feeding cannula was advanced from the hysteroscope barrel, and firstly methylene blue and then an air bubble were applied to the fluid-filled uterine cavity through this flexible cannula. Results: When the reference method was taken as hysterosalpingography, the specificity of hysteroscopy was found to be 85.71% (95% CI (confidence interval): 42.13%– 99.64%), sensitivity 94.74% (95% CI: 85.38–98.90%). The positive predictive value of hysteroscopy was calculated as 98.18% (95% CI: 89.78%–99.70%) and the negative predictive value was 66.67% (95% CI: 38.96%–86.24%). Observing the bubble and swirl effect together in the evaluation of the tube opening increases the diagnostic accuracy. And benefit of hysteroscopy in the evaluation of tubal passage was statistically significantly higher than hysterosalpingography. Conclusion: Considering the cellular damages that can be caused by hysterosalpingraphy and the real observation power provided by hysteroscopy, simultaneous evaluation and the comfort of making intervention possible, hysteroscopy will be a more useful and useful application. Keywords: Hysteroscopy; Hysterosalpingography; Shawki-bubble test; Methylene blue test; Tubal passage
URI: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2752
Appears in Collections:2. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2709-0094-49-1-014.pdf449.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.