Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2744
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ebina, Yasuhiko | - |
dc.contributor.author | Takeuchi, Mizuki | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-11T06:51:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-11T06:51:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-02 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2744 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the policies and practices of delivery facilities in Japan Yasuhiko Ebina1,*, Mizuki Takeuchi2 , Maya Nakamura1 1Division of Comprehensive Development Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, 060-0812 Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan 2Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, 060-0812 Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan *Correspondence: ebiyas@hs.hokudai.ac.jp (Yasuhiko Ebina) Academic Editor: Luca Roncati Submitted: 12 October 2021 Revised: 4 December 2021 Accepted: 13 December 2021 Published: 10 January 2022 Abstract Background: To clarify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the policies and practices of delivery facilities in Japan from April 2020 to March 2021. Methods: We conducted an online survey of midwives working in obstetric wards nationwide between May 15, 2021, and July 31, 2021. We analyzed the 376 valid responses. Results: With the COVID-19 pandemic, most facilities have barred or partially restricted families and other visitors from being present (patient companions) in outpatient clinics, prenatal classes, during delivery, inpatient care, and inpatient visits. These changes were implemented nationwide, regardless of regional differences in the pandemic state of COVID-19. Meanwhile, by facility classification, prenatal classes, companion at birth, and inpatient visits were more likely to be canceled at perinatal centers than at clinics. The acceptance of “satogaeri deliveries” (a custom in Japan where pregnant women return to their natal homes for labor and childbirth) was partially restricted to about 40% of facilities, although this rate was lower in the four Kanto prefectures (Tokyo, Kanagawa, Saitama, and Chiba). Conclusions: With the COVID-19 pandemic, the differences in Japan’s policies and practices of delivery facilities were attributed more to the role played by facilities in the regional perinatal system than to regional pandemic status. Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; Delivery facility; Health care surveys; Maternal-child health centers; Maternity hospital | en_US |
dc.subject | COVID-19 pandemic | en_US |
dc.subject | Delivery facility | en_US |
dc.subject | Health care surveys | en_US |
dc.subject | Maternal-child health centers | en_US |
dc.subject | Maternity hospital | en_US |
dc.title | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the policies and practices of delivery facilities in Japan | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | 2. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2709-0094-49-1-006.pdf | 2.36 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.