Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2127
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJ. Zahumensky, J. Zahumensky-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-08T04:19:26Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-08T04:19:26Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2127-
dc.description.abstractThe impact of national guidelines on EBM implementation in clinical practice: a comparison between the practices in two countries J. Zahumensky 1 , P. Psenkova 1 , P. Janku 2 , P. Ventruba 2 12nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Bratislava and Comenius University, Bratislava (Slovak Republic) 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Brno University Hospital and Masaryk University Medical School, Brno (Czech Republic) Summary Objective: To determine if the application of guidelines for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) management adopted by professional society in a country improves healthcare compared to a country where the guidelines are not adopted. Materials and Methods: In 2008 and 2016, a questionnaire was sent to every maternity ward in the Czech and Slovak Republics. In 2011, the guidelines for OASIS management were published in the Czech Republic. The authors compared the changes in the management of OASIS in both countries and evaluated the effect of the guidelines on healthcare improvement. Results: In 2008, the current Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) classification of OASIS was not used by any hospital in both countries. In 2016, the classification was used by 48.8% of hospitals in the Czech Republic and by 11.5% of hospitals in the Slovak Republic. The percentage of hospitals in the Czech Republic which used antibiotic prophylaxis while treating OASIS increased from 87.3% in 2008 to 100% in 2016. In the Slovak Republic, the percentage decreased from 85.7% to 73.1%. Active follow-up increased in the Czech Republic from 40% to 70.8%. In the Slovak Republic, it increased from 33.3% to 38.5%. In 2008, the management according to EBM was not performed by any of centres participating in the survey. In 2016, this percentage increased to 34.1% in the Czech Republic and to 3.8% in the Slovak Republic. Conclusion: The introduction of guidelines improved healthcare more significantly compared to the country where guidelines are not yet adopted. Key words:en_US
dc.subjectGuideline adherenceen_US
dc.subjectObstetrical anal sphincter injuriesen_US
dc.subjectOASIS managementen_US
dc.subjectEBMen_US
dc.titleThe impact of national guidelines on EBM implementation in clinical practice: a comparison between the practices in two countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:2. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
0390-6663-46-3-413.pdf271.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.