Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1989
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Eckler, Rebecca | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-06T05:19:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-06T05:19:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-10 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1989 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Adhesive incisional drapes during cesarean delivery for preventing wound infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Rebecca Ecklera, Johanna Quist-Nelsonb, Gabriele Sacconec, Harvey Wardd, Vincenzo Berghellab,* a Sidney Kimmel College of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA c Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy d Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, Australia A R T I C L E I N F O Article history: Received 12 March 2019 Received in revised form 16 July 2019 Accepted 28 July 2019 Available online 2 August 2019 Keywords: Cesarean delivery Adhesive drapes Plastic drapes Postoperative infection Surgical site infection A B S T R A C T Objective: To compare the incidence of wound infection after cesarean delivery in procedures conducted using adhesive incisional drapes verses no adhesive incisional drapes. Study Design: Searches were performed in electronic databases (MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, OVID, EMBASE, and the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews). We included randomized controlled trials comparing adhesive incisional drapes to no adhesive incisional drapes during cesarean delivery. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was wound infection. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, to produce relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: 52 publications were identified through initial search of databases and two randomized controlled trials were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis examined a total of 1943 subjects and showed a statistically significant increase in wound infections in patients in the adhesive incisional drape group when compared to the control group (RR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.02–1.65). Conclusion: Adhesive incisional drapes may increase the incidence of wound infections after cesarean delivery. Further studies are necessary to explore this relationship in the setting of current postoperative infection prophylaxis, including broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage, skin preparation and vaginal cleansing. | en_US |
dc.subject | Cesarean delivery Adhesive drapes Plastic drapes Postoperative infection Surgical site infection | en_US |
dc.title | Adhesive incisional drapes during cesarean delivery for preventing wound infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | 1. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.