Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1931
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDwyer, Lucy-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-05T11:22:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-05T11:22:46Z-
dc.date.issued2019-04-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1931-
dc.description.abstractLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) using an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh$ Lucy Dwyer*, Wilfred Kumakech, Karen Ward, Fiona Reid, Anthony Smith The Warrell Unit, Saint Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom A R T I C L E I N F O Article history: Received 19 July 2018 Received in revised form 10 January 2019 Accepted 23 January 2019 Available online 8 February 2019 Keywords: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy LSCP Ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh Vault prolapse A B S T R A C T Objectives: Since 2005 the preferred method for surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse within the department has been laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh. The study aimed to explore the functional and anatomical outcomes and mesh adverse events of women following this procedure. Study design: All women who had a Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) using an ultra-lightweight (19 g/ m2) polypropylene mesh in two units in the North West of England between March 2005 and January 2013 (n = 238) were invited to participate in the study. Functional outcome data was collected using the Patient Global Impression Questionnaire (PGI-I), the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and the Electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire (EPAQ) post-operatively. Anatomical outcome was assessed by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) measurement. A mesh palpability assessment was performed and any mesh complications were recorded using the International Continence Society/International Urogynecology Association (ICS/IUGA) classification system. The results were compared to those in our previously published series using the same surgical technique but a standard weight mesh (82.5 g/m2). Results: 89% of participants reported that they felt their post-operative condition had improved. POP-Q results revealed that the median position of C changed from 3 pre-op to 7 post-operatively. Mesh was palpable during vaginal examination in only 3 women (3%). No mesh extrusion was identified during the study. Conclusions: The study demonstrates that LSCP performed with an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh improves women’s functional and anatomical symptoms and appears to have a low risk of mesh extrusion.en_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy LSCP Ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh Vault prolapseen_US
dc.titleLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) using an ultra-lightweight polypropylene meshen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:1. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
4.pdf392.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.