Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11698
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSurboyo, Meircurius Dwi Condro-
dc.contributor.authorManuaba, Ida Bagus Pramana Putra-
dc.contributor.authorChessa, Marco Adriano-
dc.contributor.authordkk.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-15T02:36:38Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-15T02:36:38Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn1658-3612-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11698-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Pigmented fungiform papillae of the tongue (PFPT) are infrequently encountered and inadequately documented pigmented lesions that pose challenges in diagnosis and subsequent treatment planning. The study was aimed at analyzing dentists’ knowledge and attitudes regarding PFPT morphologies, to determine diagnosis and subsequent treatment planning. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among dentists in East Java through an online questionnaire. Four clinical photographs of PFPT were presented, accompanied by seven questions assessing dentists’ knowledge of PFPT, including lesion types, tongue structure involvement, Holzwanger classification, lesion patterns, suspected diagnoses and the nature of the lesion (benign or malignant). Additional questions to evaluate attitudes included prior experience with PFPT in practice, potential malignant transformation, diagnostic investigation and required treatment. Knowledge-associated attitude differences were statistically analyzed with the ManneWhitney test with a threshold of p < 0.05. Result: A total of 117 dentists participated, most of whom were women (69.23%) and were 26-30 years of age (44.44%). Dentists 41-50 years of age had superior knowledge to those 20-30 years of age (p = 0.005). Practitioners with 1-5 years of experience showed significant differences in knowledge regarding PFPT (p < 0.05). No significant differences in knowledge level and attitudes were observed, particularly regarding PFPT treatment and supporting investigation (p > 0.05). However, prior encounters with PFPT cases were significantly associated with treatment decisions and supporting investigations for diagnosis (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Most participating dentists had substantial knowledge of PFPT cases. Dentists’ understanding, as reflected in their attitudes toward investigating and treating PFPT, was notably influenced by prior encounters with PFPT cases.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOriginal Article;728-736-
dc.subjectAttitudeen_US
dc.subjectDentisten_US
dc.subjectKnowledgeen_US
dc.subjectMalignanten_US
dc.subjectPFPTen_US
dc.subjectTongueen_US
dc.titleDentists’ knowledge and attitudes regarding PFPT: A single study in East Java, Indonesiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Vol 19 No 4 (2024)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
728-736.pdf1.75 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.