Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11057
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kloester, Joy | - |
dc.contributor.author | Brand, Gabrielle | - |
dc.contributor.author | Willey, Suzanne | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-03T01:53:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-07-03T01:53:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-10 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Research Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11057 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Problem: Midwifery philosophy promotes informed decision-making. Despite this, midwives report a lack of informed decision-making in standard maternity care systems. Background: Previous research has shown a woman’s ability to make informed decisions within her maternity care significantly impacts her childbearing experience. When informed decision-making is facilitated, women report positive experiences, whereas when lacking, there is an increased potential for birth trauma. Aim: To explore midwives’ experiences of facilitating informed decision-making, using third-stage management as context. Methods: Five midwives from Victoria, Australia, were interviewed about their experiences with informed decision-making. These interviews were guided by portraiture methodology whereby individual narrative portraits were created. This paper explores the shared themes among these five portraits. Findings: Five individual narrative portraits tell the stories of each midwife, providing rich insight into their philosophies, practices, barriers and enablers of informed decision-making. These are then examined as a whole dataset to explore shared themes, and include; ‘informed decision-making is fundamental to midwifery practice’ ‘the system’, and ‘navigating the system’. The system contained the sub-themes; hierarchy in hospitals, the medicalisation of birth, and the impact on midwifery practice, and ‘navigating the system’ – contained; safety of the woman and safety of the midwife, and the gold-standard of midwifery. Discussion and conclusion: Midwives in this study valued informed decision-making as fundamental to their philosophy but also faced barriers in their ability to facilitate it. Barriers to informed decision-making included: power-imbalances; de-skilling in physiological birth; fear of blame, and interdisciplinary disparities. Conversely enablers included continuity models of midwifery care, quality antenatal education, respectful interdisciplinary collaboration and an aim toward a resurgence of fundamental midwifery skills. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | en_US |
dc.subject | Informed | en_US |
dc.subject | Continuity of care | en_US |
dc.subject | Interdisciplinary collaboration | en_US |
dc.subject | Third-stage labour | en_US |
dc.subject | Qualitative | en_US |
dc.subject | Narrative | en_US |
dc.title | How midwives facilitate informed decisions in the third stage of labour – an exploration through portraiture | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Vol 127 2023 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
How-midwives-facilitate-informed-decisions-in-the-third-stage-of-_2023_Midwi.pdf | 1.38 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.