Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10666
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCrespo-Bellid, Mayra-
dc.contributor.authorHeadrick, Gabby-
dc.contributor.authorL opez, Miguel Angel-
dc.contributor.authorHolcomb, Jennifer-
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Ariana-
dc.contributor.authorSapkota, Shanti-
dc.contributor.authorHollis-Hansen, Kelseanna-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-24T02:21:40Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-24T02:21:40Z-
dc.date.issued2024-12-20-
dc.identifier.issn21618313-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10666-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health emergency (PHE), the federal government deployed policy flexibilities in food and nutrition assistance programs including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) to meet the needs those experiencing economic hardship. Emergent literature evaluates the impact of these flexibilities on program outcomes. The objective of this study was to explore the impact of policy flexibilities deployed during the COVID-19 PHE on access, enrollment/retention, benefit utilization, and perceptions of SNAP and WIC. Keyword searches were performed in November 2023, February 2024, and August 2024. The search included peer-reviewed literature from 2020 to 2024, following Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, resulting in 37 eligible articles. Twelve studies evaluated policy flexibilities in SNAP only, 21 in WIC only, and 4 in both programs. Across these, 12 studies explored program access, 7 enrollment/retention, 13 benefit utilization, and 15 program perceptions. JBI critical appraisal tools were used to assess risk of bias. The reviewed articles show that although SNAP and WIC participants identified challenges to access, there were increases in enrollment/retention due to policy flexibilities enabling remote services and reducing administrative burden in both programs. Benefit increases led to greater purchase of preferred foods in SNAP and greater access to fruit and vegetables in WIC. Overall, participants were satisfied with the flexibilities and reported most were beneficial for their households. Some implementation challenges were identified by participants and staff. A few studies showed potential risks of bias, including selection bias and confounding bias. COVID19-related policy flexibilities in SNAP and WIC demonstrated significant improvements in selected program outcomes; however, challenges communicating policy flexibilities to authorized vendors and participants created difficulties to benefiting from the flexibilities. Findings from the evaluations of these flexibilities can inform future program enhancements and long-term regulatory changes. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023493302). Keywords: SNAP, WIC, program access, enrollment, retention, benefit utilization, policy flexibilitiesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.en_US
dc.subjectSNAP,en_US
dc.subjectWIC,en_US
dc.subjectprogram access,en_US
dc.subjectenrollment,en_US
dc.subjectretention,en_US
dc.subjectbenefit utilization,en_US
dc.subjectpolicy flexibilitiesen_US
dc.titleA Systematic Review: The Impact of COVID-19 Policy Flexibilities on SNAP and WIC Programmatic Outcomesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:VOL 16 NO 2 (2025)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
8. A Systematic Review.pdf694.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
9. in memoriam Dr.Silvador.pdf200.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
10. dr silvador.pdf175.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
11.Corrigendum.pdf226.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.