Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10398
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIndarti, Junita-
dc.contributor.authorSyaharutsa, Danny Maesadatu-
dc.contributor.authorSurya, Ilham Utama-
dc.contributor.authorAlda, Kristian-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-10T03:07:49Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-10T03:07:49Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-
dc.identifier.citationResearch Articleen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10398-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To determine the effectiveness of self-sampling method, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic and considering Indonesia’s cultural context. Methods: This study utilized a cross-sectional design, and involved patients at the Gynecology and Colposcopy Clinic of Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital. The estimated sample size was 48, determined using a diagnostic test formula. The sample population consisted of female patients with positive VIA or abnormal Pap smear results. Each patient underwent HPV DNA self-sampling and clinician sampling tests using the GenoFlow HPV Array technique and continued with colposcopy. All patients were also administered a questionnaire consisting of eight questions about their perspective on the self-sampling HPV DNA test. The data analysis employed a 2 × 2 table using SPSS version 20, and Cohen’s kappa coeffi cient was calculated to measure the agreement between the sampling results of patients’ and clinicians’. Results: Among the examinations conducted by clinicians, there were 33 patients with positive HPV results, whereas through self-sampling, there were 28 patients with positive HPV (p=0.00). High risk HPV was the most commonly observed, with HPV type 16 appearing the most (15%). Based on these data, the self-sampling sensitivity, specifi city, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 85%, 100%, 100%, and 75%, respectively, with a concordance rate of 89.6%. The Cohen’s Kappa coeffi cient between samples taken by the clinician and self-sampling resulted in K=0.778, which is considered a good agreement (K=0.61-0.80). All patients concluded that the procedure was easy (100%), and the majority (60.5%) expressed a preference for the self-sampling method. Conclusion: There is a good agreement between the results of self-sampling and clinician sampling for detecting HPV DNA, with patients positively accepting the self-sampling method, indicating its potential as an effective cervical cancer screening method.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIndones J Obstet Gynecolen_US
dc.subjectCervical Cancer Screeningen_US
dc.subjectClinician Samplingen_US
dc.subjectHuman Papillomavirusen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Samplingen_US
dc.titleConcordance and Acceptability of HPV DNA Genotyping Test by Patient’s Self-Sampling Against Clinician Samplingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Volume 12 No 2 2024

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
8.pdf58.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.