<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11378">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11378</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11406" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11404" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11401" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11399" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-11T21:07:42Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11406">
    <title>The social and healthcare professional support drawn upon by women antenatally during the COVID-19 pandemic: A recurrent, cross-sectional, thematic analysis</title>
    <link>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11406</link>
    <description>Title: The social and healthcare professional support drawn upon by women antenatally during the COVID-19 pandemic: A recurrent, cross-sectional, thematic analysis
Authors: Jackson, Leanne; Davies, Sian ˆ M.; Gaspar, Monic; Podkujko, Anastasija; Harrold, Joanne A.; Pascalis, Leonardo DE; Fallon, Victoria
Abstract: Objective: To explore antenatal experiences of social and healthcare professional support during different phases&#xD;
of social distancing restriction implementation in the UK.&#xD;
Design: Semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone or video-conferencing software between 13&#xD;
July 2020 – 2 September 2020. Interviews were transcribed and a recurrent, cross-sectional, thematic analysis&#xD;
was conducted.&#xD;
Participants: Twelve antenatal women were interviewed during UK social distancing restrictions (Timepoint 1;&#xD;
T1) and a separate sample of twelve women were interviewed in the initial easing of these restrictions (Timepoint 2; T2).&#xD;
Findings: T1 themes were: ‘Maternity care as non-essential’ and ‘Pregnancy is cancelled’. T2 themes were:&#xD;
‘Technology is a polarised tool’ and ‘Clinically vulnerable, or not clinically vulnerable? That is the question’.&#xD;
Key conclusions: At T1, anxieties were ascribed to the exclusion of partners from routine care, and to perceived&#xD;
insensitivity and aggression from the public. For T2, insufficient Governmental transparency led to disillusionment, confusion, and anger. Covert workplace discrimination also caused distress at T2. Across timepoints:&#xD;
deteriorated mental wellbeing was attributed to depleted opportunities to interact socially and scaled back&#xD;
maternity care.&#xD;
Implications for practice: Recommendations are made to: protect maternal autonomy; improve quality of mental&#xD;
health and routine care signposting; prioritise parental community support in the re-opening of ‘non-essential’&#xD;
services; prioritise the option for face-to-face appointments when safe and legal; and protecting the rights of&#xD;
working mothers.</description>
    <dc:date>2024-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11404">
    <title>Swedish maternity care professionals’ perception of labor induction</title>
    <link>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11404</link>
    <description>Title: Swedish maternity care professionals’ perception of labor induction
Authors: Raoust, Gabriel; Hansson, Stefan Rocco; Kajonius, Petri
Abstract: Background: Sweden recently adopted new labor induction guidelines lowering the threshold for post-term&#xD;
pregnancies to 41+ weeks. Despite evidence-based foundation, these guidelines stirred controversy among&#xD;
maternity care professionals, who voiced concerns about potential risks and unintended consequences, such as a&#xD;
rising Caesarean section rate. Midwives also highlighted potential impacts on their roles, workload, and working&#xD;
environment; implications that could affect obstetricians and gynecologists as well. Investigating Swedish maternity care professionals’ views on labor induction could benefit policymakers, managers, and birthing women&#xD;
alike.&#xD;
Aim: The aim of this study was to describe and compare midwives to obstetricians/gynecologists, with regards to&#xD;
their views on labor induction, and how this relates to other work-related variables such as overall job satisfaction, clinical experience, gender, age, personality, and workload.&#xD;
Methods: Swedish midwives (N = 207, 99 % women, M = 45.2 years), and obstetricians/gynecologists (N = 240,&#xD;
83 % women, M = 44.3 years) responded to an online questionnaire reflecting aspects of maternity care work.&#xD;
The data was analyzed using Welch’s t-test and Pearson’s correlation analysis.&#xD;
Results: A large difference was observed in labor induction views between midwives and obstetricians/gynecologists (d = 1.39), as well as lower job satisfaction with midwives (d = -0.26). Overall job satisfaction further&#xD;
correlated negatively with views on labor induction (r = -0.30).&#xD;
Conclusions: Labor inductions might pose challenges to midwives and could bring to light underlying tensions&#xD;
between obstetricians/gynecologists and midwives. Given the modest response rate of the study, we cautiously&#xD;
suggest that while the development of new maternity care guidelines should be grounded in evidence, they&#xD;
should also embrace concerns and insights from a diversity of professional perspectives.</description>
    <dc:date>2023-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11401">
    <title>Reported respectful maternity care received during childbirth at health facilities: A cross sectional survey in Eastern province, Rwanda</title>
    <link>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11401</link>
    <description>Title: Reported respectful maternity care received during childbirth at health facilities: A cross sectional survey in Eastern province, Rwanda
Authors: Muhayimana, Alice; Kearns, Irene; Darius, Gishoma; Olive, Tengera; Thierry, Uhawenimana C.
Abstract: Background: Respectful maternity care (RMC) fosters positive childbirth experiences and ensures safe motherhood. While past Rwandan studies on childbirth predominantly focused on negative experiences, our research&#xD;
delved into positive experiences. This study aimed to assess the RMC level experienced by women during&#xD;
childbirth in health facilities of Eastern Province of Rwanda.&#xD;
Methodology: We conducted a cross-sectional survey on 610 mothers at their discharge across five public hospitals. We used a 15-items RMC questionnaire developed by White Ribbon Alliance, version of 2019. To manage&#xD;
the right-skewed data, we employed a median cut-off, categorizing experiences into binary outcome (low and&#xD;
high RMC score). We performed stepwise backward elimination logistic regression model to identify predictors of&#xD;
high RMC.&#xD;
Findings: The majority (70.2%) reported experiencing RMC. The most acclaimed RMC items (over 90%) included&#xD;
allowance of food and fluid intake (98.5%), non-discrimination (96.2%), receipt of necessary services (96.1%),&#xD;
and privacy (91.3%). The chi-square analysis showed an association between reported high RMC and marital&#xD;
status (p-value = 0.006), occupation (p-value = 0.001), and mode of delivery (p-value = 0.001). Caesarean&#xD;
section delivery was associated with high RMC in multivariate logistic regression with a p-value of 0.001, the&#xD;
adjusted odds ratio was 2.11 with a CI [1.40–3.17].&#xD;
Conclusion: The reported RMC items and care appreciated at high level should be sustained. Regardless of mode&#xD;
of delivery, all mothers should experience consistent, utmost respect throughout the childbirth and should&#xD;
receive RMC at maximum level.</description>
    <dc:date>2024-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11399">
    <title>Men’s involvement in maternal health in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review of enablers and barriers</title>
    <link>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11399</link>
    <description>Title: Men’s involvement in maternal health in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review of enablers and barriers
Authors: Moyo, Enos; Dzinamarira, Tafadzwa; Moyo, Perseverance; Murewanhema, Grant; R, Andrew
Abstract: Background: Globally, there are about 800 maternal deaths every day, with low-to-middle-income countries&#xD;
accounting for most of these deaths. A lack of access to maternal healthcare services is one of the main causes of&#xD;
these deaths. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), one of the barriers to accessing maternal healthcare services by&#xD;
women is a lack of their male partners’ involvement. This scoping review aimed to assess the enablers and&#xD;
barriers to men’s involvement in maternal healthcare services.&#xD;
Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews&#xD;
(PRISMA-ScR) checklist was used as a guide for this review. We searched for peer-reviewed articles published&#xD;
between 2013 and 2023 in the English language from SCOPUS, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Africa Journals Online&#xD;
(AJOL), and Google Scholar databases. Two reviewers independently conducted the data extraction and article&#xD;
selection. All of the authors discussed and decided on the codes and categories for enablers and barriers after&#xD;
using NVivo to generate them.&#xD;
Results: Twenty-seven articles were used in this review. Of these, seventeen were qualitative studies, six were&#xD;
quantitative studies, and four were mixed-methods studies. The enablers of men’s involvement in maternal&#xD;
healthcare were grouped into sociodemographic factors, health system factors, and policy factors, while barriers&#xD;
were grouped into sociodemographic, cultural, economic, and health system barriers. The lack of maternal health&#xD;
knowledge, insufficient economic resources, and unfriendly staff at healthcare facilities all contributed to a lack&#xD;
of involvement by men.&#xD;
Conclusion: To improve men’s involvement in maternal healthcare in SSA, there should be economic empowerment of both men and women, health education, and the provision of adequate infrastructure in healthcare&#xD;
facilities to accommodate men.</description>
    <dc:date>2024-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

