3-84 (Februari, 2021) http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4392 2026-04-30T00:23:57Z 2026-04-30T00:23:57Z Barbour, Liza R. Woods, Julie L. Brimblecombe, Julie K. http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4410 2023-04-05T04:49:25Z 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z

Title: Translating evidence into policy action: which diet-related practices are essential to achieve healthy and sustainable food system transformation? Authors: Barbour, Liza R.; Woods, Julie L.; Brimblecombe, Julie K.

2021-02-01T00:00:00Z Wood, Nicholas http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4409 2023-04-05T04:47:47Z 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z

Title: Charlotte’s accessible web: how West Australian children and adolescents can access e-cigarettes online Authors: Wood, Nicholas

2021-02-01T00:00:00Z Hedrick, Kyli Borschmann, Rohan http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4408 2023-04-05T04:46:05Z 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z

Title: Addressing self-harm among detained asylum seekers in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic Authors: Hedrick, Kyli; Borschmann, Rohan

2021-02-01T00:00:00Z Kay, Valerie Livingstone, Charles http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4407 2023-04-05T04:43:55Z 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z

Title: A socioecological discourse of care or an economistic discourse: which fits better with transition? Authors: Kay, Valerie; Livingstone, Charles Abstract: Objective: To analyse a ‘socioecological’ health promotion discourse and its relationship to orthodox ‘economistic’ discourse in Australia. Method: In research on health promotion addressing equity and environmental sustainability, we identified a socioecological discourse, based on an ethic of care for people and ecosystems. Using Foucault’s concept of discourse as a regime that produces and legitimises certain kinds of knowledge, and ecofeminist historical analysis, we analysed this discourse and its relationship to economism. Results: The socioecological discourse takes social and ecological wellbeing as primary values, while economism takes production and trade of goods and services, measured by money, as primary. Following British invasion, property-owning white men in Australia had the right to control and profit from land, trade, and the work of women and subordinate peoples. A knowledge regime using money as a primary measure reflects this history. In contrast, a First Nations’ primary value expressed in the study was ‘look after the land and the children’. Conclusion and implications for public health: Public health often attempts to express value through economism, using monetary measures. However, socioecological discourse, expressed for example through direct measures of social and ecological wellbeing, appears more fit for purpose in promoting a fair and sustainable society.

2021-02-01T00:00:00Z