<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection: 175-246 (Juni, 2020)</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4307" />
  <subtitle>175-246 (Juni, 2020)</subtitle>
  <id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4307</id>
  <updated>2026-04-14T20:40:03Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-14T20:40:03Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Authors’ response to Sepsis in cancer: a question of definition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4321" />
    <author>
      <name>Marvelde, Luc te</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Whitfield, Ann</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Shepheard, Jennie</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Read, Carla</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Milne, Roger L.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Whitfield, Kathryn</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4321</id>
    <updated>2023-04-03T07:02:26Z</updated>
    <published>2020-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Authors’ response to Sepsis in cancer: a question of definition
Authors: Marvelde, Luc te; Whitfield, Ann; Shepheard, Jennie; Read, Carla; Milne, Roger L.; Whitfield, Kathryn</summary>
    <dc:date>2020-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sepsis in cancer: a question of definition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4320" />
    <author>
      <name>Valentine, Jake C.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Thursky, Karin A.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Worth, Leon J.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4320</id>
    <updated>2023-04-03T07:00:48Z</updated>
    <published>2020-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Sepsis in cancer: a question of definition
Authors: Valentine, Jake C.; Thursky, Karin A.; Worth, Leon J.</summary>
    <dc:date>2020-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Policies influencing the provision of healthy food and drinks in local government-owned sport and recreation facilities in Victoria, Australia</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4319" />
    <author>
      <name>Riesenberg, Devorah</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Blake, Miranda R.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Boelsen-Robinson, Tara</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Peeters, Anna</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Cameron, Adrian J.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4319</id>
    <updated>2023-04-03T06:58:58Z</updated>
    <published>2020-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Policies influencing the provision of healthy food and drinks in local government-owned sport and recreation facilities in Victoria, Australia
Authors: Riesenberg, Devorah; Blake, Miranda R.; Boelsen-Robinson, Tara; Peeters, Anna; Cameron, Adrian J.
Abstract: Objective: Sporting facilities owned or managed by local governments (LGs) can promote&#xD;
health by selling healthy food and drinks. This study assessed the policies, attitudes and&#xD;
practices of LGs in Victoria, Australia, relating to obesity prevention and the provision of healthy&#xD;
food in their sporting facilities.&#xD;
Methods: An online survey was e-mailed to all Victorian LGs (n=79) in July 2018. Questions&#xD;
assessed LGs’ healthy food policies relating to sport and recreation facilities and the priority LGs&#xD;
give to obesity prevention.&#xD;
Results: Forty-nine LGs (62%) completed the survey from July to November 2018. Obesity&#xD;
prevention and promotion of healthy food and drink were a moderate to high priority for&#xD;
councils. The priority LGs give to healthy food promotion was reported to have increased over&#xD;
the previous year in 55% of LGs. Those LGs in areas of higher socioeconomic position and&#xD;
located in major cities had made more healthy changes at their facilities.&#xD;
Conclusion: Obesity prevention is a priority for LGs, and they are making changes to improve&#xD;
the food environments in their sporting facilities. Greater support may be required for&#xD;
smaller LGs and those in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas to create healthier food&#xD;
environments.&#xD;
Implications for public health: Monitoring changes to healthy eating policies within council&#xD;
facilities is essential to understand how local government actions are contributing to obesity&#xD;
prevention.</summary>
    <dc:date>2020-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Preventing and controlling Cryptosporidium spp. in aquatic facilities: environmental health practitioners’ experiences in Victoria, Australia</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4318" />
    <author>
      <name>Cullinan, Lauren</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>McLean, Sarah</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Dunn, Louise</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4318</id>
    <updated>2023-04-03T05:11:20Z</updated>
    <published>2020-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Preventing and controlling Cryptosporidium spp. in aquatic facilities: environmental health practitioners’ experiences in Victoria, Australia
Authors: Cullinan, Lauren; McLean, Sarah; Dunn, Louise
Abstract: Objective: To identify barriers and enablers to preventing and controlling Cryptosporidium spp.&#xD;
in aquatic facilities as perceived by environmental health practitioners (EHPs).&#xD;
Methods: A qualitative, constructivist study with a purposive sample of seven EHPs from&#xD;
Victoria, Australia, was conducted. A focus group discussion was guided by a semi-structured&#xD;
interview schedule using open-ended questions. The audio-recorded focus group was&#xD;
transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.&#xD;
Results: Five themes represented the perceived barriers and enablers: i) pool water testing&#xD;
methods; ii) resources and training for EHPs; iii) knowledge and behaviour of aquatic facility&#xD;
operators and swimming pool users; iv) regulation; and v) aquatic facility and swimming&#xD;
pool design. Two key barriers within these themes included aquatic facility regulation and&#xD;
unhealthy swimming behaviours.&#xD;
Conclusions: Several barriers and enablers to preventing and controlling Cryptosporidium spp.&#xD;
in aquatic facilities were perceived by EHPs. Suggestions to overcome perceived barriers were&#xD;
also identified. Further research is required to determine the impact of these findings on the&#xD;
incidence of cryptosporidiosis associated with aquatic facilities.&#xD;
Implications for public health: The findings contribute to a greater understanding of the&#xD;
barriers and enablers to Cryptosporidium spp. prevention and control in aquatic facilities, which&#xD;
may improve the effectiveness of current prevention and control strategies.</summary>
    <dc:date>2020-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

